Reduced penetrance of COL1A1/2 pathogenic variants linked with osteogenesis imperfecta: analysis of a large population cohort
Pagnamenta, A. T.; Fasham, J.; Beaumont, R. N.; Baker, D.; Hall, T.; Baple, E. L.; Balasubramanian, M.; Jackson, L.; Wright, C. F.
Show abstract
Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is under consideration for inclusion in several genomic newborn screening initiatives, but its penetrance in clinically-unselected populations is currently unknown. It is an exemplar condition for evaluating penetrance in adult cohorts due to its relatively low mortality, variable expressivity and link to several large genes. Using genome sequencing data from [~]500,000 adults in UK Biobank, we curated a set of rare pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in COL1A1, COL1A2 and IFITM5 using annotations from gnomAD, ClinVar and SpliceAI. Analysis of summed read-count data from genome and exome sequencing led to exclusion of 16 mosaic variants with consistently low allelic balance of 3.4-35.9%. We identified 61 likely constitutive heterozygous pathogenic variants in COL1A1 and COL1A2 (29 loss-of-function or splice variants and 32 missense) in 115 participants, with a mean age at recruitment of 55.1 years; no pathogenic variants were identified in IFITM5. Phenotypes were assessed using ICD-10 codes, self-reports and heel bone mineral density. Overall disease penetrance was lower than anticipated: 40.7% for COL1A1 and 21.3% for COL1A2, potentially due to depletion of severe early-onset disease. When considering only truncating variants in COL1A1, disease penetrance increased to 73.1%, and 90% of individuals had reduced levels of circulating COL1A1 protein. For COL1A2, bone mineral density data supported the low penetrance, whereas for COL1A1, data suggested the possibility of a subclinical phenotype. Overall, for pathogenic missense variants (including those altering Gly-Xaa-Yaa repeats), the low penetrance observed suggests reliance on current ClinVar assertions to support pathogenicity may overstate OI risk in population screening.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of actionable genetic variants in 4,198 Scottish volunteers from the Viking Genes research cohort and implementation of return of results 94%
- Extracting and calibrating evidence of variant pathogenicity from population biobank data 94%
- Missense variants affecting the actin-binding domains of PLS3 cause X-linked congenital diaphragmatic hernia and body wall defects 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Utility of genome sequencing and group-enrichment to support splice variant interpretation in Marfan syndrome 94%
- Assessment of the variant prioritisation strategy for genomic newborn screening in the Generation Study 93%
- A gene pathogenicity tool 'GenePy' identifies missed biallelic diagnoses in the 100,000 Genomes Project 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A comparative medical genomics approach may facilitate the interpretation of rare missense variation 93%
- Assessing performance of pathogenicity predictors using clinically-relevant variant datasets 91%
- Advancing Genotype-Phenotype Analysis through 3D Facial Morphometry: Insights from Cri-du-Chat Syndrome 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Millennium-Old Pathogenic Mendelian Mutation Discovery for MultipleOsteochondromas from a Gaelic Medieval Graveyard. 95%
- A genome-wide association analysis of loss of ambulation in dystrophinopathy patients suggests multiple candidate modifiers of disease severity 93%
- Clinical case study meets population cohort: Identification of a BRCA1 pathogenic founder variant in Orcadians 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Regionally enriched rare deleterious exonic variants in the UK and Ireland 93%
- Exome-wide analysis of congenital kidney anomalies reveals new genes and shared architecture with developmental disorders 92%
- The contribution of common regulatory and protein-coding TYR variants in the genetic architecture of albinism 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.