Predicting Relapse and Psychosocial Functioning in Major Depressive Disorder: A Machine Learning Approach Using Clinical and Resting-State fMRI Data
Puder, L. M.; Winter, N. R.; Goltermann, J.; Meinert, S.; Flinkenfluegel, K.; Krieger, J. M.; Hubbert, J. M.; Leenings, R.; Fisch, L.; Ernsting, J.; Barkhau, C. B. C.; Konowski, M.; Grotegerd, D.; Slump, T. M.; Meinert, H.; Schrammen, E.; Altegoer, L.; Leehr, E. J.; Usemann, P.; Teutenberg, L.; Stein, F.; Thomas-Odenthal, F.; Straube, B.; Alexander, N.; Jamalabadi, H.; Jansen, A.; Nenadic, I.; Kircher, T.; Gross, J.; Hahn, T.; Dannlowski, U.
Show abstract
BackgroundMachine learning approaches pave a promising avenue to advance individual predictions about psychiatric illnesses, possibly using biomarkers. Here, we investigate longitudinal individual-level predictions of depressive relapse and the level of psychosocial functioning. MethodsClinical variables (containing detailed symptom profile, previous disease course, as well as environmental and psychological protective and risk factors) and resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) measures were used to predict relapse and the level of psychosocial functioning after a two-year follow-up interval in 346 patients (240 female) with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Random Forest machine learning models were computed to test the incremental predictive capability of clinical and rsFC data compared to a reference model containing confounding variables, and of a multimodal model (combining rsFC and clinical data) compared to the clinical model. ResultsClinical information significantly predicted future psychosocial functioning beyond the reference model (21% versus 12% explained variance, p < 0.001). Depression relapse can be predicted by clinical information, however not significantly better than by the reference model alone (64.64% versus 57.70% balanced accuracy, p = 0.062). Resting-state data did not yield above-chance accuracies on its own (12% explained variance and 51.72% balanced accuracy) and did not hold incremental predictive value compared to clinical variables for either outcome. ConclusionsBaseline clinical information can be used to predict individual future psychosocial functioning, while rsFC patterns fall short of predicting clinical trajectories in MDD over a two-year interval. Sample size, model complexity and methodological considerations are discussed as potential sources of poor translation of MDD biomarkers.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Disrupted Limbic-Prefrontal Effective Connectivity in Response to Fearful Faces in Lifetime Depression 96%
- Brain-Symptom Network Models of Depressive Symptoms: Understanding Heterogeneity and Clinical Implications 96%
- Neuroimaging Correlates of Emotional Response-Inhibition Discriminate Between Young Depressed Adults With and Without Sub-threshold Bipolar Symptoms 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Higher amplitudes of visual networks are associated with trait but not state- depression. 96%
- Brain Functional Connectivity and Anatomical Features as Predictors of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Outcome for Anxiety in Youths 95%
- Effective connectivity during faces processing in major depression – distinguishing markers of pathology, risk, and resilience 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Importance of test-retest reliability for promoting fMRI based screening and intervention in major depressive disorder 95%
- The Influence of Phenotyping Method on Structural Neuroimaging Associations with Depression in UK Biobank 95%
- Paving the way for precision treatment of psychiatric symptoms with functional connectivity neurofeedback 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictive Patterns of Antidepressant Response from Pre-Treatment Reward Processing using Functional MRI and Deep Learning: Key Results from the EMBARC Randomized Clinical Trial 93%
- Effective connectivity of LSD-induced ego dissolution 93%
- Aberrant levels of cortical myelin distinguish individuals with unipolar depression from healthy controls 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.