Machine Learning Analysis of Routine EEG Accurately Predicts Anti-Seizure Medication Response
Galer, P. D.; Grecco, G. G.; Zhang, F.; Mathur, A.; Halford, J. J.; Cole, A. J.; Chappell, A. S.; Garofalo, E.; Paul, S. M.; Detke, M.; French, J. A.; Wang, K.; Li, Q.
Show abstract
Despite the availability of more than 20 anti-seizure medications (ASMs), approximately half of patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy fail their first drug trial. Unfortunately, clinicians lack objective tools or consensus guidelines to match individual patients with the most effective therapy, frequently leading to years of uncontrolled seizures. Here, we developed machine learning models to utilize a single, baseline routine resting-state scalp EEG to forecast ASM efficacy. EEGs and treatment outcomes were drawn from 280 participants with new-onset focal epilepsy in the prospective, multicenter Human Epilepsy Project. Recordings were acquired within four months either before ASM initiation (unmedicated EEG) or after treatment onset (medicated EEG). For each recording we computed band-limited static and dynamic functional-connectivity and entropy-based matrices in consecutive time windows. We trained and tested classifiers in a nested fashion to predict future seizure freedom. Separate classifiers were trained to (i) predict levetiracetam response from unmedicated EEGs (22 responders, 32 non-responders) and from EEGs recorded on an ASM (53 responders, 31 non-responders); (ii) predict lamotrigine response from unmedicated EEGs (12 responders, 21 non-responders); and (iii) distinguish participants who ultimately proved refractory to all ASMs from unmedicated EEG (67 responders, 16 refractory) and EEGs recorded while on an ASM (34 responders, 80 refractory). Two model architectures were tested for each classifier. Performance, evaluated with nested leave-one-out cross-validation, was robust across at least one model architecture for each classifier: area under the ROC curve (AUC) 0.88 and balanced accuracy 0.85 for unmedicated levetiracetam, AUC 0.82 and balanced accuracy 0.77 for medicated levetiracetam, AUC 0.79 and balanced accuracy 0.80 for unmedicated lamotrigine, AUC 0.92 with balanced accuracy 0.87 for unmedicated refractory, and AUC 0.82 with balanced accuracy 0.75 for the medicated refractory model. These findings indicate that routine EEG harbors machine-learning-detectable signatures predictive of specific ASM efficacy, laying groundwork for precision-medicine tools that could shorten the costly trial-and-error period in epilepsy treatment.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Amplitude of high frequency oscillations as a biomarker of the seizure onset zone 96%
- Ambulatory Video EEG extended to 10 days: A retrospective review of a large database of ictal events 96%
- Internal and External Validation of Comprehensive High-Frequency Activity Biomarkers for Epilepsy Surgery 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Blinded study: prospectively defined high frequency oscillations predict seizure outcome in individual patients 96%
- Effects of spatial sampling on network alterations in idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Can routine EEG be enough? 96%
- Low frequency interictal EEG biomarker for localizing seizures 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction of treatment response in infantile epileptic spasms syndrome using EEG phase-amplitude coupling 94%
- Sleep increases broadband fast oscillations in the epileptic focus of patients with focal cortical dysplasia 94%
- Noninvasive Brain Stimulation as Focal Epilepsy Treatment in the Hospital, Clinic, and Home 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.