Dose-Escalation Study of Amygdalar Transcranial Focused Ultrasound in Healthy Volunteers
Spivak, N. M.; Bishay, A. A. E. D.; Haroon, J.; Hopkins, A. R.; Tanabe, J.; Halavi, S.; Hoang-Dang, B.; Swenson, A. J.; Schafer, S. F.; Schafer, M. E.; Bystritsky, A.; Bookheimer, S.; Monti, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundTranscranial focused ultrasound (tFUS) is a promising noninvasive technique for modulating deep brain structures, but the optimal and safe intensity range for neuromodulation remains unclear. Current FDA intensity limits, designed for diagnostic use rather than therapy, may limit the potential effectiveness of tFUS. ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of escalating tFUS intensities targeting the right amygdala in healthy volunteers, including intensity levels exceeding current FDA diagnostic ultrasound limits. MethodsTen healthy adults (mean age = 19.5 {+/-} 1.4 years; 70% female) participated in a within-subject, repeated-measures design. Each received four randomized tFUS stimulation conditions (ISPTA.3 = 0.72-10.08 W/cm{superscript 2}) using the BX Pulsar 1002 system. Structural MRI was performed before each stimulation to monitor safety. Affective modulation was assessed pre- and post-stimulation via the International Affective Picture Set (IAPS) task, measuring changes in valence and arousal ratings. Acoustic modeling was conducted using BabelBrain to estimate intracranial energy deposition. ResultsNo adverse events or MRI-detectable structural changes (e.g., edema, hemorrhage, or microstructural abnormalities) occurred under any stimulation condition. Behavioral analyses revealed no significant overall effects of intensity on affective measures. Comparisons between excitatory and inhibitory paradigms showed no significant differences. ConclusionstFUS of the right amygdala at intensities up to 10.08 W/cm{superscript 2} ISPTA.3--over 14 times the FDA diagnostic limit--was well tolerated and produced no structural or subjective adverse effects. These findings support the safety of higher-intensity tFUS and justify further investigation in larger and clinical populations to explore potential dose-response effects on emotion regulation.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation enhances emotional bias towards happiness in healthy young adults: A comparative study of electrical and ultrasound stimulation 94%
- Towards individualized deep brain stimulation: A stereoelectroencephalography-based workflow for neurostimulation target identification 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Vibrotactile auricular vagus nerve stimulation alters limbic system connectivity in humans: A pilot study 95%
- Detailed measurements and simulations of electric field distribution of two TMS coils cleared for obsessive compulsive disorder in the brain and in specific regions associated with OCD 95%
- Failure to modulate reward prediction errors in declarative learning with theta (6 Hz) frequency transcranial alternating current stimulation. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Short periods of bipolar anodal TDCS induce no instantaneous dose-dependent increase in cerebral blood flow in the targeted human motor cortex 93%
- Group and Individual Level Variations between Symmetric and Asymmetric DLPFC Montages for tDCS over Large Scale Brain Network Nodes 93%
- Real Time and Delayed Effects of Subcortical Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Systematic Review and Large-Scale tES and TMS Electric Field Modeling Study Reveals How Outcome Measure Selection Alters Results in a Person- and Montage-Specific Manner 94%
- Effects of tDCS Dose and Electrode Montage on regional cerebral blood flow and motor behavior 94%
- Glutamate-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (GluCEST) Detects Effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to the Motor Cortex 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.