Effectiveness, cost effectiveness and experiences of switching from intravenous to oral antibiotics in neonates with probable early onset sepsis: a systematic review
Whear, R.; Abbott, R.; Aughey, H.; Rogers, M.; Bethel, A.; Logan, S.; Boxall, K.; Thompson Coon, J.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo assess the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and experiences of switching from intravenous antibiotics to oral antibiotics in neonates with suspected early onset sepsis (EOS). DesignSystematic review. PatientsClinically stable term and later preterm neonates with suspected EOS. InterventionsOral antibiotics. Main outcome measuresMortality and morbidity, cost and resource use, family related and process outcomes and experiences of families and health care professionals. Information sourcesWe searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, HMIC, SPP, CENTRAL, CINAHL and Conference Abstracts (via Web of Science) in April 2025. Database searches were supplemented with citation chasing, contacting authors and website searches. MethodsScreening, data extraction and critical appraisal was performed in duplicate. Due to heterogeneity of outcomes, timepoints and lack of reported data relating to the data distribution, a narrative synthesis was performed. The review was informed by public collaborators interested in maternal health. ResultsAfter de-duplication, 3803 titles and abstracts were screened for relevance with 27 assessed for eligibility at full text. Following title and abstract screening, one randomised controlled trial (504 neonates) and three observational studies (795 neonates) were included. Length of stay was reduced by between 1 to 4 days across all four studies. No differences were observed between study arms in those reporting on readmission rates, reinfection or mortality. ConclusionsThis systematic review suggests that switching clinically stable term and late pre-term neonates with suspected EOS from intravenous to oral antibiotics can reduce hospital stay and healthcare costs without increasing morbidity, mortality, or readmission. Key messagesO_LIWhat is already known on this topic C_LI Intravenous antibiotics are commonly prescribed in neonatal care to treat suspected early onset sepsis (EOS). Distinguishing infectious from non-infectious cases is difficult, often leading to unnecessary intravenous antibiotic treatment in uninfected neonates. A recent systematic review of oral antibiotics for neonatal infections concluded that in general, adequate serum levels can be achieved after oral administration of antibiotics in neonates. O_LIWhat this study adds C_LI There is promising evidence that switching clinically well, term and late preterm neonates with suspected EOS from intravenous to oral antibiotics reduces duration of hospital stay with no impact on readmissions, clinical deterioration, mortality, or reinfection. O_LIHow this study might afect research, practice or policy C_LI Future research should focus on longer-term outcomes such as effects on the gut microbiome and later childhood health, evaluations of cost-effectiveness, incorporating both healthcare system and family perspectives, and ensure that equity considerations are fully addressed.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Criteria to Achieve Safe Antimicrobial Intravenous-to-Oral Switch in Hospitalised Adult Populations: A Systematic Rapid Review 96%
- Indirect impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic at two tertiary neonatal units in Zimbabwe and Malawi: an interrupted time series analysis 93%
- The clinical, humanistic, and economic outcomes, including experiencing of patient safety events, associated with admitting patients to single rooms compared with shared accommodation for acute hospital admissions. A narrative synthesis systematic literature review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk of SARS-CoV-2 testing, PCR-confirmed infections and COVID-19--related hospital admissions in children and young people: birth cohort study 91%
- Investigation of factors associated with delayed initiation of breastfeeding in Papua New Guinea: a cross-sectional study 90%
- Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents born very preterm and its correlates: a cross-sectional study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Kangaroo mother care for preterm or low birth weight infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
- Clinical prediction models to diagnose neonatal sepsis in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review 94%
- Essential Emergency and Critical Care – a consensus among global clinical experts 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Diagnosing early-onset neonatal sepsis in low-resource settings: development of a multivariable prediction model 93%
- Indirect effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on paediatric health-care use and severe disease: a retrospective national cohort study 91%
- ‘Admissions to paediatric medical wards with a primary mental health diagnosis: a systematic review of the literature’ 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- A complex ePrescribing-based Anti-Microbial Stewardship (ePAMS+) intervention for hospitals combining technological and behavioural components: protocol for a feasibility trial 92%
- A single centre randomised, feasibility study using point-of-care (POC) testing for respiratory viruses to direct oral corticosteroids use in preschool-aged children with acute wheeze. A Protocol. 92%
- The SQUEEZE pilot trial: a trial to determine whether septic shock reversal is quicker in pediatric patients randomized to an early goal directed fluid-sparing strategy vs. usual care 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.