Dual pandemic of firearm injury and COVID-19 in Central and Southeastern Ohio: An interrupted time series analysis
Williams, H.; Armstrong, M.; Alexander, R.; Groner, J.; Lu, B.; Kovach, S.; Giambri, R.; Xiang, H.
Show abstract
BACKGROUNDFirearm injuries increased as the United States faced the onset and first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic, a phenomenon some refer to as the "dual pandemic." Across the country, evidence suggests regional firearm injury rates and related mechanisms behind trends in firearm injury during this time differ, presumably according to local context. This study examines how one regional trauma system fared during the dual pandemic and explores potential explanatory mechanisms of the surge of firearm injuries during the COVID-19 period. METHODSWe used an interrupted time series model to compare quarterly data from 2016-2021 from the COTS (formerly known as the Central Ohio Trauma System) Regional Trauma Registry to examine the proportion of firearm injuries among all trauma cases, case mortality and rates of mistriage among firearm injuries, and the proportion of firearm injuries associated with substance use. RESULTSAmong 3,727 firearm-injured patients, demographic characteristics did not vary with respect to firearm injury, mistriage, mortality, substance use, or alcohol use. Rates of firearm injuries presenting to COTS rose slightly from the beginning of 2020 Q2 (4.54%) through the end of 2020 Q4 (4.71%), and rates continued to grow and remained at a heightened level after the lockdown period. There was no significant change in the growth rate of firearm injuries between 2021 Q2 and 2021 Q3. From 2020 Q4 to 2021 Q2, rates of firearm injury rose 0.99% (CI: 0.05%, 1.9%) from the 2016 average (p<0.05). Considering the entire period from 2016 to 2021, the lockdown period had effects on firearm injury rates that approached significance (p=0.059). There were no significant changes in the rates of undertriage, overtriage, mortality, substance use, or alcohol use. Length of stay did not significantly differ before and during the COVID period. CONCLUSIONThis Midwest regional trauma system was affected by the dual pandemic of increased firearm injury during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the regional trauma system showed resilience, as patient care metrics did not experience significant deficits. Evidence suggests further research into the mechanisms behind significantly increased firearm injury in the region in several months of 2020.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- "What matters in help-seeking and disclosure intent of intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic:Similarities and differences across demographic groups" 92%
- Differences in COVID-19 Risk by Race and County-Level Social Determinants of Health Among Veterans 92%
- Temporal Geospatial Analysis of COVID-19 Pre-infection Determinants of Risk in South Carolina 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Epidemiological Patterns of Motorcycle-Related Injuries in Cameroon: A Comparative Analysis of Motorcycle Users and Pedestrians 93%
- Alcohol Use among Emergency Medicine Department Patients in Tanzania: A Comparative Analysis of Injury Versus Non-Injury Patients 92%
- Assessment of Standard HIV Testing Services Delivery to Injured Persons Seeking Emergency Care in Nairobi, Kenya: A Prospective Observational Study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Excess Mortality in the United States During the First Three Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic 92%
- Survival and predictors of deaths of patients hospitalized due to COVID-19 from a retrospective and multicenter cohort study in Brazil 91%
- The prevalence and influencing factors for anxiety in medical workers fighting COVID-19 in China: A cross-sectional survey 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors associated with self-reported health among New Zealand military Veterans: a cross-sectional study 93%
- A mixed methods study protocol to develop and pilot a Competency Assessment Tool to support therapists in the care of patients with blunt CHest trauma (CATCh Study) 92%
- Psychosocial impact of the Covid-19 pandemic: Identification of most vulnerable populations 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.