Back

Ultra-High-Throughput LC-MS Method for Targeted Protein Degradation Compound Screening Using the Orbitrap Astral Mass Spectrometer

Lin, H.; Yang, Y.-Y.; Maity, S.; Sun, Q.; Wang, J.

2025-10-19 biochemistry
10.1101/2025.10.18.683219 bioRxiv
Show abstract

High-throughput proteomics analysis is crucial for targeted protein degradation (TPD) compound screening. Here, we developed a 300 sample per day (SPD) LC-MS method using the Orbitrap Astral mass spectrometer for ultra-high-throughput TPD compound screening. We identified close to 8,000 protein groups from a single cell line with a coefficient of variance (CV) of less than 10%, highlighting the deep proteome coverage and method reproducibility even at 300 SPD. This high degree of precision provides the statistical confidence to detect subtle, yet significant, changes in protein abundance that were previously challenging to quantify in high-throughput workflows. To evaluate the quantitation accuracy of this method, we further mixed the digests from two or three species at different ratios. Our three-proteome mixture results demonstrated highly accurate quantitation for proteins with both small and large fold changes. Moreover, our two-proteome mixture experiment, where 20 to 160 ng of yeast digest was spiked into 200 ng of HeLa digest, showed an R2 of 0.999 for the yeast proteome, underscoring the quantitation accuracy of the method. Utilizing this workflow, we studied dose-dependent protein degradation patterns induced by pomalidomide, iberdomide, and mezigdomide. Our results indicate that mezigdomide may possess enhanced efficacy in T cells by degrading additional proteins such as IKZF2, thereby boosting anti-cancer immunity. Together, we developed an ultra-high-throughput LC-MS method with excellent proteome coverage and quantitation accuracy that is highly suitable for chemoproteomics screening of drug libraries.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.