Optimization and Comparative Evaluation of SimpliAmp and Bio-Rad Thermal Cyclers for PCR-Based Detection of Vibrio cholerae
Okpanachi, V. U.; Truong, K.; Lopez, G. U.; Cooper, K. K.; Kilungo, A.
Show abstract
Cholera continues to pose a significant public health risk in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), necessitating quick, cost-effective, and dependable diagnostics for effective outbreak surveillance and management. In this study, we optimized and tested two PCR-based assays targeting a uniplex assay with the ompW gene, and a multiplex assay with ctxA, O1-rfb, and O139-rfb genes of Vibrio cholerae (V. cholerae) on two thermal cycler platforms with different cost: the Bio-Rad C1000 Touch, which is more expensive, and the SimpliAmp, which is cheaper. Cycling conditions, annealing temperatures, and primer concentrations were systematically optimized to improve efficiency and reagent use. We tested our assay sensitivity by serially diluting gBlock DNA from 2000 to 50 copies. Quo data software was used to estimate the limit of detection and Fishers exact tests with Holm-Bonferroni correction to assess any differences (p<0.05) across all dilution levels on both platforms. The ompW assay achieved identical performance on both platforms, with 100% detection down to 250 copies and an LOD of 523 copies (95% CI: 347- 786; p = 1.000). For the multiplex assay, O1-rfb showed slightly higher sensitivity on SimpliAmp (LOD= 509 copies, 95% CI: 339-766) than on Bio-Rad (LOD = 333 copies, 95% CI: 255-688; p = 0.217). The ctxA assay had an LOD of 684 copies (95% CI: 501-1323) on SimpliAmp and 974 copies (95% CI: 714-1784) on Bio-Rad (p = 0.089). For O139-rfb, SimpliAmp and Bio-Rad achieved LOD values of 639 (95% CI: 490-1251) and 1060 copies (95% CI: 719-1562), respectively (p = 0.179). In general, the differences in performance between platforms were not statistically significant. These results highlight the potential of SimpliAmp as a reliable, low-cost alternative for cholera diagnostics in LMICs and low-resource settings, supporting broader access to molecular tools for outbreak investigation and public health surveillance.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of a Novel Molecular Assay to the Diagnostic of COVID-19 Based on Real Time PCR with High Resolution Melting 95%
- A Novel Dual Probe-based Method for Mutation Detection using Isothermal Amplification 95%
- An international, interlaboratory ring trial confirms the feasibility of an open-source, extraction-less “direct” RT-qPCR method for reliable detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in clinical samples 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Analytical and Clinical Comparison of Three Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Detection 95%
- Reverse Transcriptase Real-Time PCR Assay for the Rapid Enumeration of Live Candida auris from the Healthcare Environment 94%
- Comparison of Commercially Available and Laboratory Developed Assays for in vitro Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Clinical Laboratories 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- PCR procedures to amplify GC-rich DNA sequences of Mycobacterium bovis 96%
- Microliter spotting and micro-colony observation: a rapid and simple approach for counting bacterial colony-forming units 93%
- Development and Validation of a multi-target TaqMan qPCR method for detection of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of commercial qPCR kits for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in pooled samples 96%
- Implementation of a Rapid RT-LAMP Saliva-based SARS-CoV-2 Testing Program in the Workplace 94%
- Near-infrared Spectroscopy evaluations for rapid differentiation of carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae from susceptible strains 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.