Validity and Reliability of the CVI Range for Clinical Research (CVI Range-CR): Baseline and One-Year Results
Chang, M. Y.; Reid, M. W.; Roman-Lantzy, C.; Contractor, D.; Granger, K.; O'Neil, S.; Crozier-Fitzgerald, F.; Veto, M.; Borchert, M. S.
Show abstract
PurposeCerebral/cortical visual impairment (CVI) is a leading cause of visual impairment in children, and significantly impacts both visual function and functional vision (the ability to use vision during real-life activities). We developed the CVI Range for Clinical Research (CVI-CR), a functional vision assessment that can be incorporated in CVI clinical trials. Herein we evaluate the psychometric properties, inter- and intra-rater reliability, and validity of the CVI Range-CR. DesignProspective, longitudinal cohort study Participants40 children with CVI MethodsParticipants underwent CVI Range-CR assessments at baseline and one-year follow-up. All assessments were recorded. A trained in-person examiner scored in-person assessments; two expert remote graders scored recorded assessments. Visual acuity was evaluated by a pediatric neuro-ophthalmologist using the six-level visual behavior scale (VBS). Main Outcome MeasuresCVI Range-CR scores (ranging from 0 to 10) using the Across-CVI Characteristics (Rating 1) and Within-CVI Characteristics (Rating 2) methods of scoring were compared among graders using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to assess inter-rater reliability. A subset of videos was scored twice by the same remote examiner to assess intra-rater reliability using the ICC. CVI Range-CR scores were compared to VBS scores (Spearmans correlation coefficient, ) to evaluate validity. Cronbachs [a] was used to assess internal consistency of the 10 items on the Within-CVI Characteristics scale. ResultsThe CVI Range-CR demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbachs [a]=0.96), excellent intra-rater reliability (ICC=0.88-0.98), good-to-excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC=0.74-0.88), and strong correlation to clinical assessment of visual behavior as measured by VBS scores (Spearmans =-0.76 to -0.86, p<0.0001). It was also sensitive to change; there were small but significant improvements in both Ratings 1 and 2 over one year (Rating 1 average: +0.35, p=0.002; Rating 2 average: +0.31, p=0.001). ConclusionsThe CVI Range-CR is a reliable and valid measure of functional vision in children with CVI. Because intra-rater reliability exceeds inter-rater reliability, longitudinal studies are recommended to use consistent graders over time. This could be accomplished by remote grading of recorded assessments via a centralized reading center.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of visual impairment on balance and visual processing functions in students with special educational needs 95%
- A psychometric evaluation of the Chinese Impact of Vision Impairment (C-IVI) questionnaire in an adult cohort with high myopia using Rasch Analysis 93%
- Reading; through the eyes of a university student: A double-masked randomised placebo-controlled cross-over protocol investigating coloured spectacle lens efficacy in adults with visual stress 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence, incidence and risk factors for myopia among urban and rural children in southern China: protocol for a school-based cohort study 93%
- Functional changes of visual cortex in pre- and post- operative intermittent exotropia patients: study protocol for a non-randomized case-control clinical trial 92%
- Developing a video expert panel as a reference standard to evaluate respiratory rate counting in paediatric pneumonia diagnosis: protocol for a cross-sectional study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automatic Measurements of Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements by Video-Oculography and Deep Learning-Based Object Detection 92%
- Visual field evaluation using Zippy Adaptive Threshold Algorithm (ZATA) Standard and ZATA Fast in patients with glaucoma and healthy individuals 91%
- Two-Photon Microperimetry: A media opacity-independent retinal function assay 91%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.