Back

Phytoplankton phenology through gene expression during the North Atlantic spring bloom decline

Meyer, M. G.; Torano, O.; Llopis-Monferrer, N. L.; Cassar, N.; Cohn, M. R.; Brzezinski, M. A.; Marchetti, A.

2025-10-15 ecology
10.1101/2025.10.15.682395 bioRxiv
Show abstract

While phytoplankton dynamics in the annual North Atlantic spring bloom have been well characterized, the physiological underpinnings driving these changes and their net impact on the biogeochemistry of the region are less understood. Phytoplankton metabolism is both affected by, and influences the regions nutrient cycling, primary production, and ultimately, the fate of carbon export. Thus, developing an understanding of these processes is critical. Phytoplankton biomass, biological rates, and gene expression data along with associated environmental parameters were measured as part of the NASA EXport Processes in the Ocean from RemoTe Sensing programs campaign to the North Atlantic to evaluate the relationships amongst these processes within the four most dominant phytoplankton groups (diatoms, dinoflagellates, haptophytes, and chlorophytes) during the spring bloom. We observe a transition from a period dominated by active diatom growth (defined as Phase I) to a period dominated by non-diatom phytoplankton groups (Phase II). Silicic acid depletion appears to limit overall production and reduce competition from diatoms, likely leading to enhanced contributions of haptophytes in Phase II. Expression of key protein-encoding genes involved in cell maintenance, photosynthesis, and nitrogen and vitamin metabolisms varied amongst the taxa throughout the observation period. Expression patterns of diatom genes involved in silicon transport suggest an apparent uncoupling between genes involved in nitrate uptake and photosynthesis, resulting in an increase in silicification independent growth. Our analysis demonstrates the utility in combining gene expression with biological rate processes to provide a more holistic view of phytoplankton bloom dynamics and phenology.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.3%
2
Limnology and Oceanography
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
12.2%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.8%
6
Journal of Phycology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
7
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
8
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
9
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
10
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
11
Hydrobiologia
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
12
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
13
Marine Ecology Progress Series
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
14
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
17
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.9%
19
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
20
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
22
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
23
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%