Back
#1
38.2%
Top 6%
9.1%
Top 20%
7.5%
Top 67%
7.5%
Top 3%
5.9%
Top 4%
5.9%
Top 76%
2.3%
Top 34%
2.3%
Top 8%
1.6%
Top 8%
1.6%
Top 12%
1.4%
Top 13%
1.3%
Top 20%
1.3%
Top 41%
1.1%
Top 36%
0.5%
Top 18%
0.5%
Top 28%
0.5%
Top 2%
0.5%
Top 29%
0.5%
Top 24%
0.5%
Should we screen less frequently for chlamydia and gonorrhoea in gay and bisexual men who have sex with men? Findings from a global crowdsourcing exercise with experts
2025-10-19
sexual and reproductive health
Title + abstract only
View on medRxiv
Show abstract
ObjectivesMany countries recommend 3-monthly chlamydia/gonorrhoea screening for men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM). New evidence about the limited impact of frequent, asymptomatic gonorrhoea/chlamydia screening on population prevalence, coupled with concerns about overburdened health services and antimicrobial resistance (from over-treatment), calls into question current approaches to asymptomatic screening. We explored sexual health professionals/experts arguments in favour/against reducing asympt...
Predicted journal destinations
1
Sexually Transmitted Infections
20 training papers
2
PLOS Global Public Health
287 training papers
3
BMJ Open
553 training papers
4
PLOS ONE
1737 training papers
5
BMJ Global Health
95 training papers
6
BMC Public Health
148 training papers
7
Scientific Reports
701 training papers
8
Nature Communications
483 training papers
9
PLOS Computational Biology
141 training papers
10
PLOS Medicine
95 training papers
11
Journal of Medical Internet Research
81 training papers
12
PLOS Digital Health
88 training papers
13
BMC Medicine
155 training papers
14
eLife
262 training papers
15
JAMA Network Open
125 training papers
16
Vaccines
131 training papers
17
Clinical Infectious Diseases
219 training papers
18
The Lancet Global Health
24 training papers
19
BMC Infectious Diseases
110 training papers
20
npj Digital Medicine
85 training papers