Back

Non-contiguous Computed Tomography Lung Scans Can be Manipulated to Permit Artificial Intelligence Analyses for Interstitial Lung Disease in Systemic Sclerosis

BARON, M.; Nguyen, Q.; Kovacina, B.; van Eeden, C.; Langs, G.

2025-10-15 rheumatology
10.1101/2025.10.14.25338002 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundArtificial Intelligence can analyse high resolution CT lung scans (HRCT) in various interstitial lung diseases (ILD) including Systemic Sclerosis (SSc). Older HRCT lung scans may have been saved as small dicom file sets consisting of non-contiguous slices. These are not amenable to AI analyses. ObjectivesOur aim was to develop and test a method of rebuilding small non-contiguous sets of HRCT lung slices into larger sets of contiguous slices that could be analysed by AI programs. MethodsWe deleted sets of dicom files from 14 large dicom file set scans from SSc patients and were left with a scan with about 30 equidistant non-contiguous slices. We then inserted copies of scans between each pair of slices to create a large dicom file set similar in size to the original large file set scan. Both the original scan and the rebuilt large dicom file set scan were analyzed by Contextflow ADVANCE Chest CT. We recorded the values for honeycombing (HC), reticular pattern (RP), ground glass opacities (GGO) and total ILD. We analyzed agreement between the original scan and the rebuilt large file set scan using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Lins concordance correlation coefficient (CCC),1 Bland-Altman limits-of-agreement (LOA) plots and the Bradley-Blackwood p value. ResultsICC, CCC, Bradly-Blackwood p values and Bland Altman plots showed excellent agreement between scans for HC, RC, GGO and total ILD except for the Bradley-Blackwood p value for RP. ConclusionsSmall non-contiguous HRCT lung scans in SSc can be manipulated to allow analysis by AI.

Published in Biology Methods and Protocols · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.