Boosting Transcript Assembly via Delineating Transcript Start and End Sites
Khan, I. M.; Zang, X. C.; Teng, A.; Zahin, T.; Shao, M.
Show abstract
Transcript assembly remains a challenging task despite the development of numerous methods. A major contributor to low assembly accuracy is the difficulty in accurately determining transcript start sites (TSSs) and end sites (TESs), due to the weak and noisy signals typically found in RNA-seq data. We present Telos, a two-stage machine learning framework for precise detection of TSSs and TESs and for transcript ranking. The method takes as input any assembly, typically generated by an existing assembler. In the first stage, Telos scores the TSSs and TESs in the input assembly using a machine learning model trained on a rich set of engineered features. These site-level scores will be passed to the second stage for transcript-level evaluation. In its second stage, Telos scores the entire transcripts by training another model that integrates features of their TSS and TES (including the inferred probabilities from the first stage), along with transcript abundance estimated by the assembler and statistics about exon lengths. We extensively evaluated Telos on ONT (cDNA and direct RNA), PacBio, and Illumina short-read RNA-seq datasets. In all cases, it consistently outperformed baseline methods. Telos is agile, but achieves substantial improvements, demonstrating the value of explicitly modeling TSS and TES, a gap in current transcript assembly tools. Telos can be paired with any assembler to accurately score the assembled transcripts. It is modular, easily extensible to emerging sequencing technologies, and hence we anticipate its broad adoption in transcriptomic studies.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancing transcriptome expression quantification through accurate assignment of long RNA sequencing reads with TranSigner 97%
- SQANTI-SIM: a simulator of controlled transcript novelty for lrRNA-seq benchmark 96%
- Identifying and quantifying isoforms from accurate full-length transcriptome sequencing reads with Mandalorion 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.