Back

Combining circulating tumor cell and circulating cell free DNA analyses enhances liquid biopsy sensitivity in detecting high grade serous tubo-ovarian carcinoma

Cavina, B.; Corra, S.; Coada, C. A.; De Luise, M.; Lemma, S.; Coluccelli, S.; De Leo, A.; Di Costanzo, S.; Mezzapesa, F.; Girolimetti, G.; De Iaco, P.; Porcelli, A. M.; Perrone, A. M.; de Biase, D.; Gasparre, G.; Kurelac, I.

2025-10-28 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.10.13.681971 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundLiquid biopsy is a promising strategy for detecting and monitoring neoplastic diseases, with circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) being the most common objects of investigation. Most analyses have focused on these biomarkers separately, and simultaneous detection has not yet been attempted in high grade serous tubo-ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC). The aim of our study was to assess whether the tandem CTC/ctDNA approach increases HGSOC detection efficiency of peripheral blood liquid biopsy. MethodsFor CTC detection, by using healthy donor samples spiked with known cancer cell numbers, we tested gene expression assays and TP53 next-generation sequencing (NGS). The latter was also applied for ctDNA detection where analytical validity was ensured by calculating the optimal variant allele frequency (VAF) threshold for mutation calling. The clinical validity of the assays was then verified on two HGSOC cohorts and respective controls. Standard 2x2 contingency tables and Wilson method were used to evaluate clinical validity, by calculating specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy with 95% confidence intervals (CI). ResultsHigh analytical sensitivity and specificity were found for both gene expression and TP53 NGS based CTC detection, as these assays specifically detected as few as five cancer cells spiked in control sample. Regarding clinical validity, the gene expression-based CTC detection showed 0.48 accuracy, 13.3% sensitivity, and 100% specificity, whereas TP53 sequencing demonstrated better assay performance (0.77 accuracy, 46.7% sensitivity, 100% specificity). For circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis, we first identified 0.31% VAF cut-off for accurate ctDNA TP53 mutation calling. Subsequent clinical validity assessment showed solid performance efficiency of the ctDNA based liquid biopsy (0.71 accuracy, 60% sensitivity, and 100% specificity), outperforming the CTC detection methods. Importantly, the tandem ctDNA/CTC analysis improved disease detection rate in both HGSOC cohorts, allowing to achieve, respectively, 73.3% and 93.3% sensitivity. Interestingly, TP53 NGS revealed CTC private variants, and shared ctDNA/CTC mutations undetected in the primary tissue, highlighting the ability of the dual-analyte approach to capture tumor heterogeneity and allow mutation cross-validation. ConclusionsOur study reveals the complementary value of simultaneous CTC and cfDNA analysis in HGSOC, advancing the translational potential of liquid biopsy integration for the management of this disease.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
2
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
3
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.8%
4
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.2%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.1%
7
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.9%
8
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
9
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
10
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
11
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
12
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
13
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
14
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.3%
15
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
19
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
20
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
21
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
22
Molecular Cancer
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
23
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.7%
26
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%