Tangled evolutionary history: genetically divergent taxa and hybrids characterise lantana invasions in Australia
Lu-Irving, P.; Encinas-Viso, F.; McMaster, E.; Callander, J.; Day, M. D.; Le Roux, J. J.
Show abstract
Aimto investigate population genomics and phylogeography in invasive lantana, including its taxonomy, spatial distribution, and patterns of morphological and genetic variation across the Australian continent. Locationthe main area invaded by lantana on the Australian continent, i.e., coastal and subcoastal eastern Australia from northern Queensland to southern New South Wales up to approximately 100 km inland, across 22 degrees latitude. The native range of lantana in the Americas was also represented. Methodswe used DArTseq to generate genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data for >600 individuals representing the native and Australian invaded ranges of lantana. We analysed data from >20,000 SNPs to identify distinct genetic clusters, and test the extent to which they corresponded with taxonomic descriptions and morphotype concepts used in lantana biological control. Genome sizes were estimated for a small representative subset of individuals using flow cytometry. We used MaxEnt to estimate habitat suitability for different lantana genetic clusters, and compared these predictions with observed patterns in biological control agent host-specificity. Resultsinvasive lantana in Australia consisted of several divergent genetic clusters of most likely tetraploid individuals. Gene flow between genetic clusters was limited, consistent with the notion that multiple species introductions and/or hybridisation events were part of the invasion history. Two widespread, homogeneous genetic clusters were found to be dominant in Australia; two other genetic clusters with more limited distributions were identified with potential for future spread. Biological control agent host preferences were consistent with identified genetic clusters. Main conclusionstreating invasive lantana as a single taxon may be counterproductive for effective management. Comprehensive taxonomic revision is needed to enable more precise identification of invasive taxa. Improved identification will support improved management, particularly if using biological control.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Signatures of selection in a recent invasion reveals adaptive divergence in a highly vagile invasive species 96%
- Spatial, climate, and ploidy factors drive genomic diversity and resilience in the widespread grass Themeda triandra 96%
- Strengths and potential pitfalls of hay-transfer for ecological restoration revealed by RAD-seq analysis in floodplain Arabis species 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Biosystematic Studies on the Status of Solanum chilense (Dunal) Reiche 96%
- Genetic structure in patchy populations of a candidate foundation plant: a case study of Leymus chinensis (Poaceae) using genetic and clonal diversity 96%
- Patterns of genetic variation in a prairie wildflower, Silphium integrifolium, suggest a non-prairie origin and locally adaptive variation. 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatial and ecological drivers of population structure in Alkanna tinctoria (Boraginaceae), a polyploid medicinal herb 96%
- Jack of all trades: genome assembly of Wild Jack and comparative genomics of Artocarpus 94%
- Relationships and genome evolution of polyploid Salix species revealed by RAD sequencing data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Covering the bases: population genomic structure of Lemna minor and the cryptic species L. japonica in Switzerland 95%
- Extensive admixture among karst-obligate salamandersreveals evidence of recent divergence and gene exchangethrough aquifers 94%
- Towards Stewardship of Wild Species and Their Domesticated Counterparts: A Case Study in Northern Wild Rice (Zizania palustris L.) 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.