Technology-mediated screening interviews for youth mental health: content validation, randomized controlled trial, and expert evaluation
Mlakar, I.; Safran, V.; Plohl, N.; Kumperscak, H. G.; Mocnik, S.; Smogavc, Z.; Smrke, U.
Show abstract
Early identification of mental health disorders in children and adolescents is essential for optimal outcomes, yet access to specialist psychiatric assessment remains limited by severe workforce shortages and geographic barriers. This study presents a comprehensive validation of technology-mediated screening interviews for youth mental health assessment through three sequential investigations (ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN68006163, registered on 16/04/2025). First, content validity was established through expert evaluation, demonstrating that all screening questions met established psychometric criteria for relevance and clarity. Next a randomized controlled trial compared psychiatrist-led interviews with tablet-based chatbot and humanoid robot modalities among 106 young patients aged 10-19 receiving mental health treatment. Psychiatrist-led interviews achieved higher satisfaction scores, particularly for communication quality, while willingness to repeat screening did not differ significantly across modalities. Personality characteristics, specifically conscientiousness and open-mindedness, predicted satisfaction with communication across all conditions. Finally, expert clinical evaluation of recorded interviews revealed comparable ratings across modalities for most dimensions, with only alignment with other assessment methods favoring psychiatrist-led approaches over robot-delivered interviews. The results show technology-mediated screening, using the proposed interview, demonstrates acceptable content validity, user feasibility from youth perspective, and clinical utility from expert perspectives. These findings support implementation of accessible, self-administered screening tools as complementary first-step assessments that maintain clinical relevance while expanding access to mental health evaluation for youth populations in underserved settings where specialist availability is limited. Author SummaryIn the research, we addressed a critical challenge in youth mental health: limited access to specialists who can conduct timely psychiatric assessments. With only one child psychiatrist available for every 350 young people needing care, many children and adolescents face significant delays in receiving help. We investigated whether AI-assisted screening interviews, conducted through tablet chatbots or humanoid robots, could expand access while maintaining clinical value. We conducted three validation studies with 106 young patients aged 10-19 and mental health experts. Our findings demonstrate that while young people preferred human psychiatrists for conducting interviews, they were equally willing to repeat screenings with technology-based systems. Importantly, expert psychiatrists rated the clinical value of information gathered through AI-assisted interviews as comparable to traditional methods across most evaluation criteria. The results suggest that technology-mediated screening could serve as an accessible first step in mental health assessment, particularly in settings where specialists are unavailable. This approach has potential to improve early identification of mental health concerns while preserving the clinical rigor necessary for responsible care of vulnerable youth populations.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Applications of Large Language Models in Psychiatry: A Systematic Review 95%
- Patients with affective disorders profit most from telemedical treatment: Evidence from a naturalistic patient cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
- Development of Goal Management Training + (GMT + ) for Methamphetamine Use Disorder Through Collaborative Design: A Process Description 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the Clinical Feasibility of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Clinical Decision Support System: A Longitudinal Feasibility Study 95%
- Development and use analysis of ‘gestioemocional.cat’, a web app for promoting emotional self-care and access to professional mental health resources during the covid-19 pandemic 95%
- Design and Formative Evaluation of a Voice-based Virtual Coach for Problem-Solving Treatment 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Psychotherapies and Psychological Support for Individuals Facing Psychological Distress during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review 95%
- Service user experiences and views regarding telemental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a co-produced framework analysis 94%
- The Benefits and Harms of Open Notes in Mental Health: A Delphi Survey of International Experts 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based Chatbots in Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: A Systematic Review 95%
- Validation of Visual and Auditory Digital Markers of Suicidality in Acutely Suicidal Psychiatric In-Patients 94%
- Remote working in mental health services: a rapid umbrella review of pre-COVID-19 literature 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Treatment provision for adults with ADHD during the COVID-19 pandemic: An exploratory study on patient and therapist experience with on-site sessions using face masks vs. telepsychiatric sessions 96%
- Implementing an Advance Choice Documents resource for Black African and Caribbean people with experience of compulsory psychiatric admission 92%
- A psychometric validation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in community-dwelling older adults 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.