Back

Patient friendly summaries of oncology consultations generated by large language models - A pilot study of patient and provider satisfaction

Harchandani, S.; Quinn, R.; Mittal, K.; Martin, A.; Wang, M.-J.; Holstead, R. G.

2025-10-15 oncology
10.1101/2025.10.13.25337951 medRxiv
Show abstract

The expanding capacity of large language models allow for improvements in patient and provider healthcare quality and experience. The medical oncology consultation often includes a discussion of a life-limiting diagnosis and complex treatment protocols. Patient recall from the discussion may be limited, and it is possible that a patient specific written summary could help with understanding, recall, and overall experience. Using a privacy compliant large language model, a prompt was instructed to rewrite an ambulatory medical consultation note as a patient friendly summary, capturing key details from a diagnosis and treatment plan. The summary was provided to both provider and patient for review and a 5-point Likert survey was administered inquiring on the outputs accuracy, clarity, and helpfulness. Patients reported agreement in 100%, 100%, and 87% on each topic respectively. 93% of patients recommended the use of similar summaries in the future. Providers reported agreement in 98%, 91%, and 96% for accuracy, clarity, and empathy respectively. All providers (100%) recommended similar summaries to be used in the future. Some of the summaries retained jargon and results from this study will be used to optimize the prompt for an expanded study. In conclusion, a patient-friendly summary derived from a medical note using a large language model prompt was helpful to patients, and found to be useful for providers Author SummaryAs medical oncology providers, our new patient consultation appointments often require disclosing the diagnosis of a cancer, and a discussion on prognosis, complex treatment plans, the potential for significant side effects, and a number of tests/procedures that are required prior to initiation of the care plan. Patients often benefit from friends or family who take notes during an appointment, however this is not always possible. Technological advances in natural language processing with large language models such as Chat GPT allow for translation of medical language into plain language. In this study, we used a prompt to rewrite a medical note into a summary of the patients oncologic diagnosis and care plan. We then provided this summary to patients and provider to assess their feedback on the value of these summaries. We found that both providers and patients found these summaries to be accurate and understandable. Both groups recommended further development of these summaries. We intend to optimize our summary production for future studies using findings and feedback from this project.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 20%
8.9%
3
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.2%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.4%
5
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
6
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
7
JMIR Medical Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
8
BMC Medical Education
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
9
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
10
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
11
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
12
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
13
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
14
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
15
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
16
BMC Health Services Research
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
17
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
18
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
19
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
21
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
22
Database
61 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
23
JMIR Formative Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
24
JAMIA Open
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
25
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
26
Archives of Disease in Childhood
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
27
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
28
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
15 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
30
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%