Randomized controlled trial of Group Interpersonal Therapy conducted by non-specialists versus waiting list for symptoms of depression and anxiety in community young adults: a Research protocol
Bertollo Alexandrino, G.; Perosa Carniel, B.; Nunes Peixoto, G.; Ribeiro de Matos, M.; Grazziotin Portal, P. H.; Nascimento da Silva, L. C.; Kieling, C.; Sica da Rocha, N.
Show abstract
IntroductionDepression is a highly prevalent and potentially chronic mental disorder with significant impact on quality of life and social support, with a frequent onset in early adulthood. Despite the existence of effective treatments, many individuals do not have access to care, do not respond to, or do not tolerate medications. Additionally, access to mental health services remains limited, especially in low- and middle-income countries, where the World Health Organization estimates that 75% of individuals do not receive adequate care. Group Interpersonal Therapy (IPT-G) is an evidence-based, structured psychotherapy recommended by international guidelines for the treatment of depression and is adaptable for task-shifting approaches in primary care. Previous research has shown promising results for IPT-G delivered by non-specialists in low-resource settings in an open study, but randomized trials by non-specialists are still lacking. ObjectivesTo evaluate the improvement in depressive symptoms after eight sessions of IPT-G among young adults with depressive symptoms in a community setting, conducted by non-specialists in a randomized trial, representing a new step in demonstrating scientific evidence for novel clinical treatments. MethodsThis randomized controlled clinical trial is planned to include 80 participants randomized (1:1) between an interventional (IPT-G) and a control (waiting list) group. Our study will enroll young adults aged 18 to 24 years with depressive symptoms. The intervention will focus on interpersonal relationships within the IPT model and will be delivered by a university student and a medical doctor trained in IPT. The primary outcomes are depressive symptoms; secondary outcomes include quality of life and social support. ResultsThe trial was approved by the Research Ethics Committee (CEP) of the HCPA (Project number: 2023-0283, CAAE: 73830223.7.0000.5327) and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06480019). Recruitment started in February 2024 and is ongoing. ConclusionThis study could support the integration of IPT-G delivered by non-specialists into public health systems worldwide as a low-cost and accessible intervention. Findings could help reduce mental health service gaps and increase the capacity of public health systems to treat depression. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDYThis study has the strength of being the first randomized controlled trial evaluating IPT-G delivered by non-specialists. It is conducted in a middle-income country, where, despite the existence of guidelines recommending IPT-G implementation by non-specialists, there are no randomized trials. The study also has some limitations: participants are not restricted from seeking other mental health treatments during the trial, and the intervention is compared with a waitlist control rather than an active treatment condition. Version 2.0 - 10 October 2025 (Final version submitted)
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 97%
- Psychotherapies and Psychological Support for Individuals Facing Psychological Distress during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review 96%
- Interventions Promoting Recovery from Depression for Patients Transitioning from Outpatient Mental Health Services to Primary Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modified Alliance-Focused Training with Doubling as an integrative approach to improve therapists’ competencies in dealing with alliance ruptures and prevent negative outcome in psychotherapy for depression. Study protocol of a randomized controlled multicenter trial 97%
- Digital delivery of Behavioural Activation therapy to overcome depression and facilitate social and economic transitions of adolescents in South Africa (the DoBAt study): protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial 95%
- A Mobile App for Prolonged Grief among Bereaved Parents: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Applications of Large Language Models in Psychiatry: A Systematic Review 96%
- Patients with affective disorders profit most from telemedical treatment: Evidence from a naturalistic patient cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
- Attitude towards Mental Help-Seeking, Motivation, and Economic Resources in Connection with Positive, Negative, and General Psychopathological Symptoms of Schizophrenia: A Pilot Study of a Psychoeducation Program 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the Clinical Feasibility of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Clinical Decision Support System: A Longitudinal Feasibility Study 93%
- Development of the NeuroFlow Severity Score and Comparison With Validated Measures for Depression and Anxiety 93%
- Development and use analysis of ‘gestioemocional.cat’, a web app for promoting emotional self-care and access to professional mental health resources during the covid-19 pandemic 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exposure to and engagement with digital psychoeducational content and community related to maternal mental health by perinatal persons and mothers: design of an online survey with optional follow-up and participant characteristics 95%
- Transdiagnostic phenotyping of psychopathology in a help-seeking population (PhenoNetz) - a study protocol for an experience sampling study 94%
- The Womens Wellness After Giving Birth Program (WWAGBP) for Vietnamese women: A single-arm trial protocol 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.