Back

Randomized controlled trial of Group Interpersonal Therapy conducted by non-specialists versus waiting list for symptoms of depression and anxiety in community young adults: a Research protocol

Bertollo Alexandrino, G.; Perosa Carniel, B.; Nunes Peixoto, G.; Ribeiro de Matos, M.; Grazziotin Portal, P. H.; Nascimento da Silva, L. C.; Kieling, C.; Sica da Rocha, N.

2025-10-17 public and global health
10.1101/2025.10.13.25337768 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionDepression is a highly prevalent and potentially chronic mental disorder with significant impact on quality of life and social support, with a frequent onset in early adulthood. Despite the existence of effective treatments, many individuals do not have access to care, do not respond to, or do not tolerate medications. Additionally, access to mental health services remains limited, especially in low- and middle-income countries, where the World Health Organization estimates that 75% of individuals do not receive adequate care. Group Interpersonal Therapy (IPT-G) is an evidence-based, structured psychotherapy recommended by international guidelines for the treatment of depression and is adaptable for task-shifting approaches in primary care. Previous research has shown promising results for IPT-G delivered by non-specialists in low-resource settings in an open study, but randomized trials by non-specialists are still lacking. ObjectivesTo evaluate the improvement in depressive symptoms after eight sessions of IPT-G among young adults with depressive symptoms in a community setting, conducted by non-specialists in a randomized trial, representing a new step in demonstrating scientific evidence for novel clinical treatments. MethodsThis randomized controlled clinical trial is planned to include 80 participants randomized (1:1) between an interventional (IPT-G) and a control (waiting list) group. Our study will enroll young adults aged 18 to 24 years with depressive symptoms. The intervention will focus on interpersonal relationships within the IPT model and will be delivered by a university student and a medical doctor trained in IPT. The primary outcomes are depressive symptoms; secondary outcomes include quality of life and social support. ResultsThe trial was approved by the Research Ethics Committee (CEP) of the HCPA (Project number: 2023-0283, CAAE: 73830223.7.0000.5327) and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06480019). Recruitment started in February 2024 and is ongoing. ConclusionThis study could support the integration of IPT-G delivered by non-specialists into public health systems worldwide as a low-cost and accessible intervention. Findings could help reduce mental health service gaps and increase the capacity of public health systems to treat depression. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDYThis study has the strength of being the first randomized controlled trial evaluating IPT-G delivered by non-specialists. It is conducted in a middle-income country, where, despite the existence of guidelines recommending IPT-G implementation by non-specialists, there are no randomized trials. The study also has some limitations: participants are not restricted from seeking other mental health treatments during the trial, and the intervention is compared with a waitlist control rather than an active treatment condition. Version 2.0 - 10 October 2025 (Final version submitted)

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
17.3%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 1%
14.5%
3
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.1%
4
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.7%
5
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
7
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
8
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
9
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
10
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
11
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
12
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
14
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
15
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
16
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
19
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
20
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
21
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
22
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
23
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%