Generative enhancement of non-invasive dataset for motor brain-computer interface by task-relevant neural signals
Kim, H.; Kim, J. S.
Show abstract
Despite the increasing adoption of deep neural networks (DNNs) in brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), developing high-degree-of-freedom (DOF) systems capable of decoding continuous movements, such as limb kinematics, remains a significant challenge. This difficulty stems from limited availability of task-specific neural features within individual neural signal datasets. To overcome this, we proposed a generative adversarial network (GAN) framework to enrich training features within neural signal datasets. Specifically, we synthesized artificial neural signal waveforms of the primary motor cortex (M1) from functionally related cortical regions, thereby enhancing neural datasets for improved motor kinematics decoding via DNN. Using magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings during goal-directed arm-reaching tasks, our results showed that enhancing individual datasets with GAN-synthesized M1 signals significantly improved decoding performance by about 10% (p < 0.05). Such improved performance is sustained even in the absence of real M1 signals. Our results highlight the potential of signal generative networks for improving and augmenting high DOF motor BCIs to achieve freely intended movements.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the robustness of deep learning based brain age prediction models across multiple EEG datasets 96%
- Resource-efficient Neural Network Architectures forClassifying Nerve Cuff Recordings on Implantable Devices 94%
- Maximum Classifier Discrepancy Generative Adversarial Network for Jointly Harmonizing Scanner Effects and Improving Reproducibility of Downstream Tasks 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.