Back

From egg to adult: comprehensive (e)DNA metabarcoding monitoring of fish diversity in a temperate estuary

Ferreira, A. O.; Machado, C.; Azevedo, O. M.; Barroso, C.; Duarte, S.; Egas, C.; Piecho-Santos, A. M.; Costa, F. O.

2025-10-12 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.10.12.681914 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Monitoring fish species through ichthyoplankton surveys provides important information for fish stock assessment and management. To test the effectiveness of DNA metabarcoding to identify fish species and to capture seasonal variations in local ichthyofauna, monthly ichthyoplankton and 2 L water samples were collected over 13 months in the lower section of the Guadiana River Estuary in southeast Portugal. Both sample types underwent high-throughput sequencing for three genetic markers (COI, 12S, 16S), with morphological identification also performed for ichthyoplankton. Bulk and water samples identified a total of 131 fish species throughout the year. DNA metabarcoding demonstrated higher taxonomic resolution and diversity detection, with 115 species recovered, while morphology identified only 23 species. Ichthyoplankton metabarcoding also detected 40% more fish than water eDNA, recovering almost the double of species despite the fact that both approaches used the same metabarcoding primers. The integration of multiple molecular markers was crucial to maximize diversity detection in both DNA-based methods. In addition, DNA metabarcoding was able to identify ichthyofaunal spawning periods and captured significant seasonal variations in fish community, with higher diversity observed during the warmer months. With this strategy, around 66% of the historically recorded ichthyoplankton taxa in the region were identified, along with several new records. The findings demonstrated the capability of (e)DNA metabarcoding to uncover seasonal variations in the regional fish community, provided new insights on the ichthyofauna of the Guadiana Estuary, and revealed the need for more in-depth studies to improve the efficiency of multiple sampling methods for fish species identification.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.3%
3
Environmental DNA
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
4
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
5
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 28%
4.3%
7
Aquaculture
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
Metabarcoding and Metagenomics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
11
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
12
Freshwater Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
13
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
16
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
18
Malaria Journal
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
19
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
22
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
23
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%