Back

High-Purity Enrichment of Extracellular Vesicles from Diverse Sources by Conventional and Image-Based Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorters for Robust Downstream Applications

Graf, I.; Salviano-Silva, A.; Behrends, J.; Rissiek, A.; Urbschat, C.; Brenna, S.; Uplegger, H.; Siebels, B.; Maire, C. L.; Lamszus, K.; Diemert, A.; Ricklefs, F. L.; Magnus, T.; Arck, P.; Puig, B.

2025-10-14 cell biology
10.1101/2025.10.12.681862 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Separating and enriching specific extracellular vesicle (EV) subpopulations from the broader EV pool present in tissues and blood is crucial for understanding their role in physiological and pathological conditions. However, high-purity enrichment of specific EV-subpopulations remains challenging due to the lack of suitable techniques. Initial studies have shown that Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting (FACS) has great potential for enriching EV subpopulations, despite the technical challenges posed by their small size. Yet, existing protocols have been inconsistent, and proper validation using state-of-the-art sorters has been inadequate. Here, we introduce an EV sorting workflow that overcomes technical challenges and allows for the analysis of EVs from various species, tissue sources and cell culture. We used two fluorescence cell sorters, the BD FACSAria Fusion and the BD FACSDiscover S8, to sort EVs with different fluorescent labels. The successful sorting of EVs was validated using high-sensitivity imaging flow cytometry, transmission electron microscopy, and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. We defined the optimal parameters for nozzle sizes, flow rates, sample dilutions, and sorting modes, enabling the enrichment of EV populations of interest to nearby 100% purity, including low-frequency EV populations of under 10%, while preserving compatibility with downstream analyses. The workflow presented here provides a powerful tool for both, basic science and translational applications.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.3%
2
Journal of Extracellular Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
3
Cytometry Part A
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
4
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
5
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Nanobiotechnology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.6%
9
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
10
PROTEOMICS
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
12
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.5%
13
Small Methods
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
14
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
15
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
16
Small
70 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
17
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
18
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
19
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
21
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
23
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%