Back

LoAR-Exo and HiAR-Exo: One-step label-free isolation of extracellular vesicles using inertial microfluidic devices

Acharya, S.; Gevari, M. T.; Anandhapadman, A.; Karandikar, S.; Mukherjee, H.; Stridfeldt, F.; Das, S.; Haag, P.; Agarwal, N.; Lewensohn, R.; Viktorsson, K.; Kaledhonkar, S.; Tayalia, P.; Dev, A.; Paul, D.

2025-10-13 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.10.10.681648 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are lipid membrane-bound nanoscale (20 nm - 1000 nm) objects shed by all cells. As EVs play an important role in intercellular signaling, these have emerged as promising biomarkers for many diseases including cancer and neurodegenerative disorders. A major bottleneck in research into EVs and their smooth translation to clinic as disease biomarkers is a lack of access to affordable and user-friendly technologies to quickly isolate EVs from complex biological and clinical samples with acceptable purity and yield. Here, we report two different designs of inertial microfluidic devices (e.g. LoAR-Exo and HiAR-Exo) that can isolate EVs from different kinds of biological samples in a single label-free step using a spiral microchannel design with different aspect ratios. LoAR-Exo has a height-to-width aspect ratio [~] 1, while HiAR-Exo has a height-to-width aspect ratio of 2.5, optimized by COMSOL simulations. We tested both designs by separating polystyrene particles of size < 1 m from a heterogeneous mixture. We then benchmarked the performance of the microfluidic chips against ultracentrifugation and a precipitation kit by isolating EVs from the cell culture-conditioned media (CCM) of MDA-MB-231 cells. We also compared the microchip with SEC by using the CCM from H1975/OR cells. The size distribution of EVs isolated by the microfluidic chip was comparable with ultracentrifugation, precipitation and SEC. In summary, both devices isolated EVs from as little as 1 mL of sample volume using a label-free technique in a continuous manner and without any user intervention. Both microfluidic platforms offer a simple, efficient, and scalable alternative to conventional methods for EV isolation.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.