Back

Effect of fluid control on the affective state of laboratory macaques

Castellano Bueno, J.; Paraskevopoulou, A.; Miller, C. W.; Petkov, C.; Schmid, M. C.; Thiele, A.; Bateson, M.; Poirier, C.

2025-10-10 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2025.10.10.681594 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Fluid control protocols are widely used in neuroscience to motivate laboratory macaques to engage with behavioural tasks. Despite strong evidence that the physiology of the animals is not compromised by such protocols, fluid control remains controversial due to its potential impact on the psychological well-being of the animals. To address this concern, we investigated the effect of fluid control on the affective state of 23 socially-housed adult macaques (10 females) engaged in neuroscience experiments. The protocol involved up to five consecutive days of fluid control per week, followed by a minimum of two days with unrestricted fluid access. The affective state of the animals was primarily assessed by quantifying the frequency of pharmacologically-validated behavioural indicators of high-arousal negative affect (self-scratching, body shaking, self-grooming). The analysis was subsequently extended to validated behavioural indicators of low-arousal negative affect (Inactive not alert) and other behaviours suspected of indicate high-arousal negative affect but lacking proper validation (pacing, yawning). In total, 700 hours of video footage spanning up to seven years of intermittent fluid control per animal were analysed. Despite this extensive dataset, the study found no significant impact of fluid control on average, or any evidence of habituation or sensitization over the years on any of the affective state indicators. Additional results indicate that these null results are not due to a lack of sensitivity, supporting the view that fluid control, as implemented in this study, does not have an adverse impact on the psychological well-being of laboratory macaques. We argue that macaque welfare will be best served by focusing future refinement on other procedures.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.6%
3
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
7.0%
5
Physiology & Behavior
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
7
Psychopharmacology
59 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
8
Behavioural Processes
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
9
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
10
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
11
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
12
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
13
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
14
Hormones and Behavior
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
15
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
16
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
Psychoneuroendocrinology
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
18
Genes, Brain and Behavior
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
19
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
21
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
23
Journal of Neuroscience Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
24
Neurobiology of Stress
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
Neuropharmacology
60 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
26
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.5%
28
Neuroscience Letters
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
29
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%
30
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%