Back

Purchase of hormonal contraceptive methods after delivery: a population-based study from Finland

Jantti, C.; Toffol, E.; Haukka, J.; Heikinheimo, O.

2025-10-13 sexual and reproductive health
10.1101/2025.10.10.25337679 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPostpartum contraception start and use are important to avoid unwanted pregnancy and to optimize birth spacing. There is limited knowledge concerning the factors influencing the type and timing of contraceptive initiation and adherence after delivery. MethodsThis was a prospective register-based study. We identified 26 650 women that delivered between 1st of January 2019 and 31st of December 2019, using the Finnish Medical Birth Register. Postpartum follow-up time for each woman was one year. The primary outcome of the study was postpartum purchase of HC from a pharmacy, identified from the Prescription Centre. Additionally, we analyzed if mode of delivery, epidural analgesia, induction of labor, hypertensive complications, fear of childbirth or gestational diabetes affected HC purchase. ResultsAltogether 33% (n=8902) of the women purchased a HC method postpartum. The most purchased method was desogestrel-only pill (56%, n=4978), and other progestin-only preparations, which covered almost 90% of all methods started. Additionally, 4% (n=1141) received an intrauterine device (IUD) in primary health care. Instrumental delivery (OR 1.15, CI 1.06-1.25), cesarean section (OR 1.26, CI 1.13-1.41 for planned C-section and OR 1.25, CI 1.15-1.36 for emergency C-section), epidural analgesia (OR 1.12, CI 1.05-1.18) and induction of labor with balloon (OR 1.14, CI 1.01-1.28) were associated with a significantly higher rate of HC purchase. ConclusionsOverall, 37% of women purchased a HC method or received an IUD during the first postpartum year. Common delivery complications were associated with higher rate of postpartum HC purchase.

Published in BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.7%
2
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 2%
9.9%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
5
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.8%
6
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
7
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.2%
9
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
10
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
11
European Journal of Human Genetics
58 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
12
British Journal of General Practice
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
13
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
14
Sexually Transmitted Infections
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
15
Social Science & Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
16
Tropical Medicine & International Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
17
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
18
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
BMJ Public Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
20
Health Policy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
21
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Nature Human Behaviour
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%