Back

Genotype imputation and error estimation in connected multiparental populations

Zheng, C.; Bossolini, E.; Formanova, N.; Rohde, A.; Boer, M. P.; van Eeuwijk, F. A.

2025-10-14 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.10.09.681496 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Multiparental populations have been produced for quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping in many crops, where next-generation sequencing has become a cost-effective tool for genotyping. Previously, we have developed a hidden Markov framework denoted by MagicImpute_mma for genotype imputation in a multiparental population, which was implemented in Mathematica. However, its computational time increases quickly with the number of parents. In this work, we extend MagicImpute_mma into MagicImpute for increasing computational efficiency and robustness to various types of errors. Particularly, it has the following novel features: (1) allowing for multiple multiparental populations that may be connected by sharing parents, (2) allowing for many missing parents that are not available for sequencing, (3) accounting for allelic bias and overdispersion in next generation sequencing data, (4) inferring marker-specific error rates and filtering for markers with low error rates, and (5) being implemented in the high performance Julia language. Besides extensive simulation studies, we evaluate MagicImpute by three real datasets: the rice F2 population with sequence depth being low, the apple F1 population with parents being outbred, and the sorghum multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross (MAGIC) population with 10 male sterile lines (out of 29 parents) being missing. The results have shown that MagicImpute is accurate for genotype imputation in connected bi- or multiparental populations with various types of sequence errors and it opens up new opportunities for QTL mapping after imputing many missing parents.

Published in GENETICS (predicted rank #3) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.