Back

Spatial organization of the tumor-immune microenvironment in ER-positive breast cancer: remodeling during treatment and associations with clinical response

Dahle, M. A.; Foerde, J.-L.; Egeland, E. V.; Creason, A. L.; Watson, C.; Garred, O.; Prasmickaite, L.; Maelandsmo, G. M.; Mills, G. B.; Engebraaten, O.; Haugen, M. H.

2025-10-10 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.10.09.681336 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe tumor microenvironment influences treatment response in ER-positive breast cancer, but what distinguishes responders from non-responders and how it changes during treatment is poorly understood. MethodsER-positive breast tumors treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab were profiled with bulk proteomics pre-(n = 95), on-(n = 84) and post-treatment (n = 100). A subset of tumors was profiled with spatial single-cell proteomics pre-(n = 13) and on-treatment (n = 11). Cell phenotypes, spatial location and activation states were determined, and cellular colocalization assessed with spatial metrics. Bulk and spatial features were evaluated against treatment response defined by residual cancer burden. ResultsTreatment with bevacizumab amplified chemotherapy effects on proteomic signaling. The immune contexture shifted from suppressive to supportive during treatment through decreased macrophage, regulatory and anergic T-cell density and increased colocalization between epithelial cells and CD8+, CD4+ T-cells and dendritic cells. At baseline, responders had high density of effector memory T-cells, while non-responders had more naive T-cells. In addition, responders had increased colocalization of epithelial cells with macrophages, and effector memory T-cells with M1-like macrophages compared to non-responders. ConclusionsSpatially distinct tumor-immune microenvironments influence response to neoadjuvant treatment, offering valuable insights for guiding treatment decisions.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.0%
2
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
3
npj Breast Cancer
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
4
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
5
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
6
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
8
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.6%
9
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
11
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
12
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
13
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.5%
16
OncoImmunology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
19
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Molecular Cancer Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
23
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
24
Neoplasia
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
27
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Immunology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.6%
30
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%