Back

Simple, Fast and Highly Efficient One-or Two-step Proteomic Preparation Enables Deep Profiling of Microgram-level FF and FFPE Tissues

Wei, C.; Zhang, Q.; Fu, C.; Leng, Y.; Huang, C.; He, F.; Yang, Y.

2025-10-10 biochemistry
10.1101/2025.10.09.678953 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Large-scale tissue proteomics requires workflows that are efficient, rapid, and repeatable across diverse samples. Herein, we present Simple Workflow for Integrated and Fast Tissue-preparation (SWIFT), which enables complete processing of fresh- frozen (FF) and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues in either one- or two-step formats, while maintaining deep proteome coverage with high repeatability from low to microgram-level tissues. For FF tissues, an incubation process integrating lysis, reduction, alkylation, and digestion generates peptide samples directly from tissues in [≤] 1.5 h. For FFPE tissues, concurrent deparaffinization, rehydration, and de- crosslinking is achieved within 0.5 h, followed by one-step peptide preparation. Furthermore, our workflows eliminate desalting and offline cleanup steps, thereby reducing variability and total processing time. Using our methods, we identified up to [~]10,000 protein groups and [~]150,000 peptides across multiple mouse organs on timsTOF Pro. Repeatability was high (pairwise Pearsons r > 0.96 across six experimental replicates), with dynamic ranges spanning 6-7 orders of magnitude. Organ-enriched protein analysis identified functionally distinct proteins unique to each tissue Paired FF and FFPE analyses revealed preservation-induced shifts, with FFPE tissues showing reduced detection of membrane-associated and respiratory proteins, including mitochondrial Complex I. Together, our fast and simplified workflows enable deep tissue proteomics for large-scale clinical and translational studies in a cost- effective and widely-accessible manner.

Published in Analytical Chemistry (predicted rank #3) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.