Mapping patient journeys: a novel method to explore patient and carer experiences of injectable anticipatory medication care in the community and identify opportunities for improvement
Fennessy, R.; Paterson, A.; Ward, J.; Clarkson, J. P.; Bowers, B.
Show abstract
BackgroundInjectable anticipatory medications are routinely prescribed ahead of need in many countries to help manage distressing end-of-life symptoms. However, little is known about the lived experience of patients and informal caregivers as they navigate the prescription and use of anticipatory medications. AimTo understand patient journeys in navigating anticipatory medication care, and to identify interactions with the greatest potential for improvement. DesignQualitative secondary analysis of longitudinal interview data using framework analysis and patient journey mapping techniques. Setting/participantsEleven patient-centred cases receiving end-of-life care in the community. Six patients, nine informal caregivers and five healthcare professionals took part (28 interviews). ResultsPatient journeys with anticipatory medications differed from intended pathways. Participants appreciated having access to injectable medications for future symptom control. However, there was suboptimal information exchange between patients, informal caregivers and healthcare professionals regarding their purpose and threshold for use. Navigating unfamiliar and complex end-of-life medication support pathways was more successful where patients could self-advocate or had live-in informal caregiver advocates, compared to those who lived alone or experienced communication difficulties. ConclusionsPatient and informal caregiver experiences of timely symptom control could be improved by healthcare professionals having open and ongoing conversations about the role of anticipatory medications. Different patient contexts and fluctuating abilities point to a need for simplified and better signposted ways for accessing healthcare professional advice, and medication input. Journey mapping techniques offer a novel way to illustrate patient and informal caregivers lived experience and can be adapted for researching other pathways. Key StatementsO_ST_ABSWhat is already known about the topic?C_ST_ABSO_LIAnticipatory prescribing is considered best practice in aiding the timely control of distressing end-of-life symptoms in the community. C_LIO_LIThe intended pathway for prescribing and using injectable anticipatory medications in the community is complex, consisting of many decision-making points and practical activities. C_LIO_LILittle is known about patients and families experiences of this care C_LI What this paper addsO_LIThe use of journey mapping techniques illustrates how patients and informal caregivers experiences of navigating anticipatory medications differ from the intended pathway. C_LIO_LIPatient personas highlight how individual patient characteristics and advocacy skills greatly influence journeys with anticipatory medications. C_LIO_LIPatients and informal carers find the systems for using anticipatory medications inherently complex and clear professional signposting is needed. C_LI Implications for practice, theory or policyO_LIpen and ongoing conversations about the purpose and use of anticipatory medications need to be tailored to individual patient and informal carer contexts. C_LIO_LIexperiential journey mapping techniques and personas is an innovative method for giving patients and their families a voice to help improve cross-organisational systems for delivering end-of-life care. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Impact on Staff of Providing Non-Invasive Advanced Respiratory Support During the Covid-19 Pandemic A Qualitative Study in an Acute Hospital 96%
- Adverse event reviews in healthcare: What matters to patients and their family? A qualitative study exploring the perspective of patients and family 96%
- Family physicians supporting patients with palliative care needs within the Patient Medical Home in the community: An Appreciative Inquiry qualitative study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Unwelcome memento mori or best clinical practice? Community end-of-life anticipatory medication prescribing practice: a mixed methods observational study 97%
- Understanding and addressing challenges for Advance Care Planning in the COVID-19 pandemic: An analysis of the UK CovPall survey data from specialist palliative care services 95%
- ‘Necessity is the mother of invention’: Specialist palliative care service innovation and practice change in response to COVID-19. Results from a multi-national survey (CovPall) 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 96%
- Integrating primary care and social services for older adults with multimorbidity: A qualitative study 96%
- Community end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Initial findings of a UK primary care survey 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative exploration of barriers to efficient and effective Structured Medication Reviews in Primary Care: Findings from the DynAIRx study 97%
- Uncertainty in serious illness: A national interdisciplinary consensus exercise to identify clinical research priorities 95%
- What support do frontline workers want? A qualitative study of health and social care workers’ experiences and views of psychosocial support during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- “We tend to get pad happy” : a qualitative study of health practitioners’ perspectives on continence care for older people in hospital 95%
- National statutory reporting: not even ticking the boxes? The quality of ‘Learning from Deaths’ reporting in Quality Accounts within the NHS in England 2017-2020 94%
- Improving local authority financial support services for users with complex health needs: a mixed-method economic evaluation of Social Navigators in South Tyneside, UK 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.