Back

Deconvolving mutation and selection reveals stage-specific drivers of thyroid cancer

Rajaei, M.; Ju, A.; Adeniran, A. J.; Townsend, J. P.

2025-10-08 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.10.08.681166 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveMutational profiles of primary and metastatic thyroid cancer (THCA) have been examined by comparison of somatic mutation prevalences in the two stages, using P values to identify significant differences. However, prevalences and P values for mutations do not directly quantify the cancer effects of somatic variants. MethodsWe calculated cancer effect sizes accounting for substantial gene- and site-specific mutation rates, to quantify somatic selection across stages. This approach provides a direct measure of cancer-driving impact of new mutations and reveals the genes that drive tumorigenesis and progression, and whether mutations have greater effects in primary or metastatic THCA. ResultsTrinucleotide mutation profiles were similar between primary and metastatic THCA. Most canonical driver genes (BRAF, NRAS, TP53, ATM, EIF1AX, KMT2C, NF1, RBM10, ARID1A, PIK3CA, and NKX2-1) exhibited stronger selection during initial tumorigenesis (from organogenesis to primary THCA) than during progression (from primary to metastatic THCA). Notably, TERT mutations have been shown to be at higher prevalence in metastatic tumors, yet their strongest selection occurred earlier, during tumor initiation. In contrast, RET mutations exhibited the opposite trajectory, experiencing weaker selection during tumorigenesis but stronger selection during metastatic progression. ConclusionCancer effect size analysis revealed dynamic shifts in selective pressures across THCA evolution, distinguishing genes that drive initiation from those that promote metastatic progression. This evolutionary framework provides a quantitative basis for understanding THCA pathogenesis and provides guidance for stage-specific precision-medicine therapeutic strategies.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.2%
2
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.2%
3
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
4
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.8%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
8
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.8%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.4%
10
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
11
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
12
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.5%
14
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
15
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
16
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.9%
19
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
20
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
21
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
22
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%
24
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%
25
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Endocrinology
38 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
27
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
28
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
30
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%