Optimal Gene Panel Selection for Targeted Spatial Transcriptomics Experiments
Lu, H.; Fang, L.; Zeng, O.; Ma, P.; Zhong, W.; Yuan, G.-C.
Show abstract
Spatial transcriptomics analysis is a powerful approach for dissecting the structure of tissue microenvironment and uncovering the mechanism of cell-cell communications. However, existing technologies are limited by either spatial resolution or gene coverage. Most single-cell resolution technologies target only a few hundreds of pre-selected genes, whose choice plays an important role in the overall analysis. It remains a challenge to optimally design a gene panel to maximize the utility of spatial transcriptomics profiling. To fill this gap, we introduce a novel method, named ReconST, to automatically design optimal gene panels for spatial transcriptomics profiling. ReconST leverages information from existing scRNA-seq data, and identifies the optimal subset of genes by using a gated autoencoder. By using a high-coverage mouse brain MERFISH dataset as the reference benchmark, we showed that ReconST outperforms existing methods in terms of both reconstruction accuracy and spatial pattern preservation. As such, ReconST provides a useful and generally-applicable tool for optimal gene panel design, which in turn can significantly enhance the utility of spatial transcriptomics profiling in a wide range of biomedical investigations.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- SpaTM: Topic Models for Inferring Spatially Informed Transcriptional Programs 98%
- SHEST: Single-cell-level artificial intelligence from haematoxylin and eosin morphology for cell type prediction and spatial transcriptomics reconstruction 97%
- CSRefiner: A lightweight framework for fine-tuning cell segmentation models with small datasets 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.