Back

Positive selection on hotspot and reinforcing regulatory alleles contributed to hexaploid bread wheat improvement.

Zhan, S.; Raherison, E.; Hargreaves, W.; Hughes, N.; Goessen, R.; Majidi, M. M.; Knox, R.; Cuthbert, R.; Lukens, L.

2025-10-08 genomics
10.1101/2025.10.08.680093 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundGenetic variation of regulatory alleles plays a key role in evolution and breeding. In polyploids, regulatory differences may preferentially affect genes on homoeologous chromosomes or sub-genomes. Selection in plant breeding may act upon total transcript dosage across homoeologous genes and on alleles that have strong effects on the transcriptome. ResultsTo investigate these questions, we identified regulatory polymorphisms between an old and a recent hexaploid bread wheat cultivar (Triticum aestivum, 2n=6x=42, AABBDD). The recent cultivar was the product of decades of selection for grain yield and quality. Regulatory allele polymorphisms preferentially affected genes on homoeologous chromosomes but rarely affected genes on specific sub-genomes. The chromosomal distributions of regulatory alleles indicated that past selection had acted upon them, and the effect of selection differed between alleles targeting environmental response genes and genes involved in other processes. Modern cultivar alleles that affected many genes transcripts corresponded to known selection targets and improved field crop performance. Modern cultivar alleles also had significant effects on homoeologous genes, and these alleles also improved crop performance. ConclusionsPolyploid breeding across many species has been and will continue to be the key factor in plant improvement. By enhancing the favorability of strong regulatory alleles and by expanding the range of gene transcript abundances, genome duplications enable breeding progress.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
12.6%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.6%
4
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.4%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
7
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
9
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
10
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
12
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
15
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
DNA Research
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
17
Gigabyte
60 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
18
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
21
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
22
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Pest Management Science
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
28
Plant Molecular Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%