Facilitators and Barriers to Recruitment and Engagement with a Randomised Controlled Trial in Mental Health Services: experiences of trial participants and intervention providers
Naughton, G.; Lloyd-Evans, B.; Billings, J.; Gray, H.; Ambler, G.; Barber, N.; Chipp, B.; Clare, J.; Conneely, M.; Evlat, G.; Bogatsu, T.; Jain, M.; Johnson, S.; Khan, H.; Lashko, J.; Lewis, G.; Marwaha, S.; Matin, Z.; McGuiness, A.; Nekitsing, C.; Pinfold, V.; Shah, P.; Vasikaran, J.; Webber, M.; Zaman, M.; Mackay, T.
Show abstract
BackgroundMany randomised control trials struggle to recruit and retain participants. Few previous studies explore participants experiences of recruitment and engagement in trials in secondary mental health care contexts, and few include the perspectives of control group participants. We addressed this knowledge gap in a sub-study of the Community Navigator trial, a multi-site UK trial of a novel, co-produced, social intervention for people with Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD) in secondary care community mental health teams. We used a mixed methods approach to explore barriers and facilitators to trial recruitment and retention, intervention engagement, and how these factors may persist and inter-relate. MethodsSemi structured interviews were conducted with 17 trial participants and with intervention providers: eight Community Navigators and one supervisor, across four UK sites. An online survey was sent to the first 100 trial participants, which could be completed anonymously. Collaborative framework analysis was used by the research team and lived experience advisory panel (LEAP) to analyse interview, focus group and survey data. ResultsFactors helping and hindering trial recruitment and engagement were described in three overarching themes: The Trial Context, Skilled Communication, and The Complexity of Depression and Anxiety. Facilitators included: maximising choice for participants at all stages, a kind and patient approach and striking the correct balance between too much and too little information about the trial. A novel finding was that researchers initiate a "virtuous cycle", where participants initial good experience generates optimism about future involvement in the trial and the experimental treatment. Barriers to recruitment and engagement included referring clinicians providing inaccurate initial information to service users, overwhelming volumes of information, concern about randomisation to the control group, and service users internal barriers regarding their mental health. ConclusionWe generated learning for future trials in mental health contexts. Consideration of how to minimise disappointment following allocation to a control group is important. A kind and patient approach from researchers is essential, and a good early experience of the research process can help trial retention and generate therapeutic optimism about the trial intervention. Trial registrationRegistered on 8 th July 2022: ISRCTN 13205972
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Service user experiences and views regarding telemental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a co-produced framework analysis 96%
- Trialling an Optimised social Groups intervention in services to Enhance social connecTedness and mental Health in vulnERable young people (TOGETHER): Study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial 96%
- Mapping young people’s journeys through mental health services: a prospective longitudinal qualitative study protocol 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring High Mortality Rates Among People With Multiple And Complex Needs: A Qualitative Study Using Peer Research Methods 96%
- While they wait: A cross-sectional survey on wait times for mental health treatment for anxiety and depression for Australian adolescents 95%
- The psychosocial impact on frontline health and social care professionals in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- ‘I had no life. I was only existing’ . Factors shaping the mental health and wellbeing of people experiencing long Covid: a qualitative study 95%
- Effectiveness, acceptability and potential harms of peer support for self-harm in non-clinical settings: A systematic review 95%
- Process Evaluation of APPLE-Tree (Active Prevention in People at risk of dementia through Lifestyle bEhaviour Change and Technology to build REsiliEnce), a Dementia-Prevention Study focused on Health and Lifestyle changes 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation strategies for telemental health: a systematic review 97%
- A qualitative investigation of crisis cafés in England: their role, implementation, and accessibility 96%
- ‘Beyond Places of Safety’ – a qualitative study exploring the implementation of mental health crisis care innovations across England 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementing an Advance Choice Documents resource for Black African and Caribbean people with experience of compulsory psychiatric admission 97%
- Service user perspectives of community mental health services for people with complex emotional needs: a co-produced qualitative interview study 95%
- A qualitative meta-synthesis of service users’ and carers’ experiences of assessment and involuntary hospital admissions under mental health legislations: a five-year update 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.