Back

Feasibility, Effectiveness, and Cost-utility of Implementing a Reconsolidation-Based Trauma Treatment in the Aftermath of the November 15 Paris Terrorist Attacks

Brunet, A.; Durand-Zaleski, I.; Maatoug, R.; El-Houari, L.; Voyer, M.; Girault, N.; Kalalou, K.; Gugenheim, L.; Dzierzynski, N.; Jehel, L.; Rotharmel, M.; Hodeib, F.; Bourla, A.; Laverre, J.; Hanafy, I.; Castaigne, E.; Ayrolles, A.; Marc, B.; Cuenca, M.; Louville, P.; Buisse, V.; Ducrocq, F.; Krebs, M.-O.; Januel, D.; Mouchabac, S.; Guillin, O.; Vaiva, G.; Zia, O.; Bissery, A.; Abgrall, G.; Benoit, M.; Le Bras, A.; Jaafari, N.; Treacy, C.; Estellat, C.; Millet, B.

2025-10-09 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.10.08.25337544 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundIn response to the Bataclan terrorist attacks, the deadliest on French soil since World War II, the Paris Memoire Vive (PARIS MEM) project was launched to expand the public hospital networks capacity to treat trauma-related disorders. Reconsolidation Therapy (RT), a brief evidence-based intervention for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), was selected for rapid implementation across hospital sites. ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness, and cost-utility of implementing RT to enhance public hospital treatment capacity after mass trauma exposure. MethodA two-arm, multicentric, preference-based clinical trial and economic evaluation compared RT to treatment-as-usual (TAU) in 332 adults, mostly with PTSD. RT involves recalling trauma under propranolol during six weekly 25-minute sessions. Feasibility endpoints included the number of hospital staff trained and the proportion of participants choosing RT. The primary effectiveness endpoint was the delta scores in PTSD symptoms from baseline to Week 52. Cost-utility was evaluated using incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). ResultsAcross hospital sites, 160 therapists were trained in two days, and more participants opted for RT (n = 262) over TAU (n = 70), supporting feasibility endpoints. After one year, mean PTSD symptom scores decreased by 38.14 points (SD = 0.10) in RT and 35.02 (SD = 1.68) in TAU (p = .297), indexing significant improvement in both groups. At Week 7, RT showed faster initial recovery (difference = -5.11; p = .041). RT had a 55.4% probability of being cheaper and more effective than TAU (8.4%), with estimated savings of 27150{euro} per QALY. Annual sick-leave costs were lower for RT (4147{euro}; 95% CI = 3 394-5 012) than TAU (7 386{euro}; 95% CI = 5 416-10 340; p = .01). ConclusionsFollowing massive trauma exposure, training mental health staff over two days in providing efficient, evidence-based, cost-effective PTSD treatment is achievable. Findings await replication. Trial RegistrationNCT02789982. HighlightsO_LIIt is feasible to train a large cohort of therapists in the aftermath of mass trauma and enhance the treatment capacities of institutions. C_LIO_LIReconsolidation Therapy worked faster than treatment as usual in the alleviation of traumatic stress symptoms. C_LIO_LIReconsolidation Therapy emerges as a cost-effective treatment, being both cheaper and more effective in 55% of cases. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
2
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.8%
3
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
5
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.8%
7
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.3%
9
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.3%
10
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
11
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
12
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.0%
13
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
15
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
16
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.6%
17
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
18
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
19
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
20
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
21
Schizophrenia Bulletin
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
24
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%