Game On or Gone Too Far? Executive Functioning and Habit Learning in Problematic vs. Recreational Gamers
Berta, K.; Pesthy, Z. V.; Vekony, T.; Farkas, B. C.; Kiraly, O.; Demetrovics, Z.; Nemeth, D.; Kun, B.
Show abstract
Video gaming often sparks controversy, though negative effects are mainly linked to gaming disorder, not gaming itself. Research shows that gaming disorder is associated with reduced executive functioning and greater reliance on habitual processes, while recreational gaming may relate to enhanced cognitive functions. However, comprehensive comparisons of cognitive profiles across gaming behaviors remain scarce. Therefore, we aimed to compare the cognitive functioning of non-gamers (NG), recreational gamers (RG), and gaming disorder risk individuals (GDR). Based on the Internet Gaming Disorder Test scores, 114 participants were classified into NG, RG, or GDR groups. Executive functions were assessed using the Go/No-Go, Counting Span, Digit Span, Card Sorting, 1-back and 2-back tasks. Habit learning was measured with the Alternating Serial Reaction Time task. The GDR group showed reduced working memory, performing worse on the Digit Span task than the NG group, and worse on the Counting Span task than both NG and RG groups. Conversely, the RG group displayed enhanced attention-related performance. No group differences emerged in other executive functions or overall habit learning. Interaction analyses revealed a negative relationship between habit learning and inhibitory control/updating across groups, supporting competition theory, while a positive link between working memory and habit learning in NG and GDR groups suggests possible compensatory mechanisms. Overall, this study underscores that cognitive impairments are linked to gaming disorder rather than gaming itself, while recreational gaming may offer cognitive benefits. These findings provide insights into the distinct cognitive profiles of recreational gamers and those at risk of gaming disorder. HighlightsO_LICognitive profiles differ for gaming disorder vs. recreational gaming. C_LIO_LIWorking memory is impaired in individuals at risk of gaming disorder. C_LIO_LIRecreational gaming is linked to enhanced attention-related performance. C_LIO_LIExecutive functions and habits compete with each other, regardless of gaming. C_LIO_LICognitive systems show both competitive and compensatory links. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Spontaneous Eye Blink Rate during the Working Memory Delay Period Predicts Task Accuracy 93%
- An event-related potential study of decision making and feedback utilization in female college students who binge drink 93%
- Processing Stage Flexibility of the SNARC effect: Task Relevance or Magnitude Relevance? 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The Relationship between Latent Inhibition, Divergent Thinking, and Eyewitness Memory: A Study on Attention to Irrelevant Stimuli 95%
- The relationship between object-based spatial ability and virtual navigation performance 94%
- Visual processing oscillates differently through time for adults with ADHD 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- No effect of tDCS on fatigue and depression in chronic stroke patients: an exploratory randomized sham-controlled trial combining tDCS with computerized cognitive training 92%
- Neurophysiologic evidence for increased memory suppression among negative ruminators 91%
- The Effect of Evaluating Self's Emotions on Frontal Alpha Asymmetry 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The neurodevelopment of delay discounting for monetary rewards in pre-adolescent children 93%
- Individual differences in fear acquisition: Multivariate analyses of different Emotional Negativity scales, physiological responding, subjective measures, and neural activation 92%
- Intention to learn modulates the impact of reward and punishment on sequence learning 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.