Drying halves decomposition rates in river networks by disrupting structure-function linkages
del Campo, R.; Datry, T.; Foulquier, A.; Lopez-Rojo, N.; Chalmandrier, L.; Csabai, Z.; Cunillera-Montcusi, D.; Rodeles, A. A.; Penas, F. J.; Pernecker, B.; Bonada, N.; Barquin, J.; Künne, A.; Sarremejane, R.; Soria, M.; Estevez, E.; Paril, P.; Mykrä, H.; Polasek, M.; Loskotova, B.; Polovic, L.; Singer, G.
Show abstract
River drying is intensifying worldwide due to climate change and water abstraction, with major consequences for biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. In river networks, drying not only alters local environmental conditions but also disrupts hydrological connectivity, reshaping the movement of organisms and resources at the network scale. Leaf litter decomposition--a key ecosystem function in freshwater systems--is particularly sensitive to changes in the structure of decomposer communities. We hypothesized that spatiotemporal patterns of drying regulate decomposition by altering the diversity and composition of detritivore macroinvertebrates, bacteria and fungi. We combined data from six European drying river networks (DRNs) spanning a wide latitudinal gradient to assess how local drying intensity and regional hydrological connectivity affect decomposition through changes in these decomposer groups. We found that short drying events ([≤] six dry days) reduced decomposition rates by up to 50% by shifting the control of decomposition from a balanced contribution of fungi, bacteria, and detritivores to one dominated by dry-tolerant but less efficient bacteria. These community shifts persisted after flow resumption, leading to sustained reductions in decomposition even under flowing conditions. Regional connectivity alleviated these negative effects of local drying by facilitating the recovery of more efficient aquatic decomposers through dispersal. However, this effect depended on DRN context. In particular, in southern, more arid DRNs, stronger fragmentation hindered the recovery of decomposer communities after flow resumption. Overall, our results provide mechanistic evidence that spatiotemporal patterns of drying can regulate the linkages between community structure and ecosystem functioning in river networks. As drying events become more frequent and prolonged, increasing disruption of these linkages will impact carbon cycling and energy fluxes in freshwater ecosystems under global change.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Putting the Asymmetric Response Concept to the test: modeling multiple stressor exposure and release in a stream food web 94%
- Rainwater-driven transport of matter and microbes from phyllosphere to soil in a temperate beech forest 91%
- Diversity-enhanced canopy space occupation and leaf functional diversity jointly promote overyielding in tropical tree communities 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rewiring of peatland plant-microbe networks outpaces species turnover 94%
- Spatial community variability: Interactive effects of predators and isolation on stochastic community assembly 93%
- Unifying ecosystem resistance, resilience, and recovery from extreme stress into a single statistical framework 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Groundwater and phenology data reveal vulnerability of riparian trees to drought 93%
- Dispersal provides trophic-level dependent insurance against a heatwave in freshwater ecosystems 92%
- Ecological theory predicts ecosystem stressor interactions in freshwater ecosystems, but highlights the strengths and weaknesses of the additive null model 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Decision making and best practices for taxonomy-free eDNA metabarcoding in biomonitoring using Hill numbers 93%
- Different factors drive community assembly of rare and common ectomycorrhizal fungi 93%
- Invertebrate-induced priority effects and secondary metabolites control fungal community composition in dead wood 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.