Back

Baseline Mismatch Negativity Amplitude Predicts Direction and Magnitude of Ketamine Effect in Healthy Volunteers -- A ''Disordinal '' Effect

Cecchi, M.; Johannesen, J.; Farley, B.; Quirk, M. C.; Mahmoud-Zadeh, M.; Uslaner, J. M.; Terry-Lorenzo, R.; Smith, D. G.; Ruhl, D. A.; Rotte, M.; Reese, A. L.; O'Donnell, P.; Mollon, J. E.; Missling, C.; Matsuoka, Y.; Marino, M.; Lee, S.; Korolev, I. O.; Klamer, D.; Jeong, A.; Honda, S.; Fadem, K. C.; Doherty, J.; Cohen, E. A.; Christensen, S.; Chadchankar, H.; Buhl, D. L.; Adachi, M.; D'Souza, D. C.; Hamilton, H. K.; Ranganathan, M.; Roach, B. J.; Ereshefsky, L.; Walling, D. P.; Potter, W. Z.; Javitt, D. C.; Mathalon, D. H.

2025-10-13 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.1101/2025.10.07.25337443 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMismatch negativity (MMN) is a component of the auditory event-related potential (ERP) that is elicited during a passive oddball paradigm where task-irrelevant infrequent deviants are presented in a stream of more frequent standard stimuli. MMN is believed to index a pre-attentive stage of auditory information processing closely linked to N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDAR). Ketamine is thought to act primarily as an NMDAR antagonist, has been used in clinical trials to model the symptoms of schizophrenia and is increasingly used in the clinic to treat depression. Various studies have reported that ketamine reduces MMN amplitude which, in turn, might reflect reduced function of NMDAR-mediated neurotransmission. Nonetheless, there is growing evidence showing MMN amplitude either having high variability or, paradoxically, moving in the opposite direction after ketamine in different individuals. MethodsIn here, we analyzed results from three independent ERP studies to test the hypothesis of a cross-over interaction ("disordinal" drug effect) between the duration-deviant MMN at baseline (without ketamine) and the direction and magnitude of the ketamine effect. To rule out regression to the mean (RTM), a statistical phenomenon that may also partially explain this cross-over interaction, we separately estimated RTM using a drug-free test-retest study. ResultsOur results are the first to statistically demonstrate the existence of a disordinal drug response to ketamine, where the direction and magnitude of ketamine-induced changes in MMN amplitude can be predicted by baseline MMN amplitude. ConclusionsThese new insights may contribute to novel precision medicine approaches to treatment of CNS disorders.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Schizophrenia
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.3%
2
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
17.4%
3
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.0%
4
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
Schizophrenia Research
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
6
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
7
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
8
European Neuropsychopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
9
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
10
Epilepsia
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
11
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
12
International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.9%
14
Schizophrenia Bulletin
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
15
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
17
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.2%
19
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
21
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
23
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Journal of Psychopharmacology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
JAMA Psychiatry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
26
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%