Back

Comparing the genetic diversity of two threatened Rhyticeros hornbill species with contrasting geographic range sizes

Devanand, N.; Bharti, D. K.; Pawar, P. Y.; Gopal, A.; Ghuman, S.; Page, N.; Joshi, J.; Naniwadekar, R.

2025-10-06 genetics
10.1101/2025.10.06.680625 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Island endemics exhibit low genetic diversity due to founder effects and geographical isolation, increasing their vulnerability to inbreeding depression. The Narcondam Hornbill (Rhyticeros narcondami), restricted to the 6.8 km2 Narcondam island in the Andaman archipelago, has the smallest range size among hornbills, a globally threatened group of birds. We compared the genetic diversity of the Narcondam Hornbill with the Wreathed Hornbill (Rhyticeros undulatus) distributed from the Eastern Himalaya to Bali. We generated DNA sequences for four mitochondrial markers ; Cytochrome B (Cytb), cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI), NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 (ND2) and displacement loop (D-loop) regions) from 14 Narcondam Hornbill faecal samples and for three markers (Cytb, COI and ND2) from 19 Wreathed Hornbill tissue samples from north-east India. Our results suggest markedly lower genetic diversity in the island endemic Narcondam Hornbill compared to the Wreathed Hornbill. Specifically, Cytb and COI showed no genetic variation in the island endemic, compared to three to five haplotypes in the Wreathed Hornbills. In the ND2 region, Narcondam Hornbills showed seven haplotypes among 13 samples compared to the Wreathed Hornbills six haplotypes among eight samples. The observed genetic diversity in the D-loop in the Narcondam Hornbill was lower than other island-endemic hornbill species in the Philippines. The extremely low genetic diversity in the Narcondam Hornbill likely stems from a small founder population and/or past hunting pressures that reduced its numbers to approximately 30% of its current population of 1000 birds, rendering the Narcondam Hornbill susceptible to environmental and human-driven changes.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.6%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
12.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.5%
4
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.3%
5
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
7
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.6%
8
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
9
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
10
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
11
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
12
Acta Tropica
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
13
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
14
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
16
Molecular Biology Reports
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
17
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
18
Hydrobiologia
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
19
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
20
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
21
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
23
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
26
Infection, Genetics and Evolution
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%