Back

From human joints to bioreactor setups: quantifying mechanical stimuli in cartilage physiology and regeneration

Mukherjee, S.; Wilson, W.; Geris, L.

2025-10-06 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.10.06.678667 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveBioreactors are widely used to apply mechanical stimuli to osteochondral (OC) explants and cartilage tissue-engineered (TE) constructs, yet their ability to replicate native joint mechanics is not well quantified. This study benchmarks common bioreactor loading protocols against a finite element (FE) model of the human knee during gait, enabling direct comparison to physiologically relevant mechanical parameters. MethodsA validated FE model of the human knee joint simulating the stance phase of gait was used to characterize physiological mechanical conditions, including maximum principal stress, maximum shear strain, pore pressure, and fluid velocity. These outputs were compared with those generated by representative bioreactor setups: dynamic unconfined compression (10-30%) and combined compression (10%) with ball rotation ({+/-}25{degrees}), which were applied to both OC plugs and TE constructs, and hydrostatic pressure (0.5-50 MPa), which was applied only to TE constructs. FE simulations evaluated spatial and magnitude-based agreement with native cartilage mechanics. ResultsIn OC plugs, 10% unconfined compression generated maximum principal stresses ([~]7.5 MPa) and pore pressures ([~] 4 MPa) closely matching native tissue ([~] 4.5 MPa and [~]5 MPa, respectively). In TE constructs, even at 30% unconfined strain, maximum principal stresses and pore pressures remained around 100 times lower than physiological values, while fluid velocities were 10 times higher. Hydrostatic loading of TE constructs at 5 MPa matched native pore pressures ([~]5 MPa) but induced negligible strains. ConclusionsThis study provides a quantitative framework for evaluating how well bioreactor loading regimens replicate physiological joint mechanics. The findings offer actionable guidance to experimentalists for selecting bioreactor conditions based on specific mechanical targets. This can lead to more effective design of in vitro cartilage studies and support translational strategies in cartilage repair and tissue engineering.

Published in Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials (predicted rank #5) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.