A Pilot Feasibility Study Evaluating a Novel Digitally-Enhanced Community Health Worker-Led Intervention Delivering Early Stepped Palliative Care, Care Navigation, Patient Education and Clinical Trial Engagement in Pancreatic Cancer Patients
Thiruvengadam, N.; Matangi, N.; Celestin-Joachim, M.; Rivas, L.; Ferrell, B.; Montgomery, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundPancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with substantial morbidity, poor quality of life, and poor overall survival. Early palliative care (PC) has been shown to improve quality of life and reduce symptom burden in PDAC, but specialty PC services are often unavailable for this fast progressing illness and even then are only utilized by a minority of PDAC patients. In response, we developed a digitally enhanced CHW-led intervention. This paper focuses on the feasibility of this PDAC intervention. MethodsAdults (aged [≥]18 years) with newly diagnosed PDAC (within 2 weeks of diagnosis) were enrolled in a single-arm pilot feasibility mixed-methods study from January to August 2025 (N=48). Based on qualitative feedback from patients and caregivers the intervention involved early palliative care engagement, patient education, care navigation, and providing targeted financial resources for patients and family caregivers (FCGs). The digital component involves using short YouTube educational videos and Twilio Short Message Service (SMS) to administer the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale weekly with patients with high symptom scores stepped up to PC visits. The CHW-led intervention was delivered over 4 weeks with data collection occurring over an additional 8 weeks. Feasibility outcomes were patient engagement with the CHW and completion of the intervention. The acceptability outcome was defined using the RE-AIM framework. Secondary outcomes include Quality of Life (QoL), Advanced Care Planning (ACP) compliance rates, financial toxicity, and time toxicity. ResultsThe median age of pts (N=48) was 69 (IQR 62-76), and 29 (60%) were Hispanic. 52% (25) had metastatic PDAC, 14 (29.1%) had borderline resectable PDAC, and 9 (18.8%) had resectable PDAC at diagnosis. Four patients died prior to the intervention completion, while the remaining patients completed the intervention. Regarding acceptability, 94% of patients completely agreed that the intervention met their approval. Themed common responses highlighted by patients centered around the critically important role of the CHW in the process, including in appointment an referral scheduling, especially as symptoms worsened. Patients physical HRQoL, symptom burden, and rates of financial toxicity decreased from baseline to 12 weeks, while 83% of patients completed ACP by 12 weeks. ConclusionsOur digitally-enhanced CHW-led intervention delivering early stepped PC was feasible and acceptable to PDAC patients. The intervention was associated with improvement in symptom burden, reduction in financial and time toxicity and improved ACP planning rates. Future prospective comparative studies are needed to understand the interventions ability to help manage the inevitable disease progression involved in late stage PDAC, including in QoL, financial and time toxicity, and ACP.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Core Outcome Set to evaluate the impact of prognostication in people living with advanced cancer: an international consensus study 94%
- Study Protocol: LIAM Mc Trial (Linking In with Advice and supports for Men impacted by Metastatic cancer) 93%
- From many voices, one question: Community co-design of a population-based qualitative cancer research study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Can Large Language Models Aid Caregivers of Pediatric Cancer Patients in Information Seeking? A Cross-Sectional Investigation 94%
- A Video Intervention to Improve Patient Understanding of Tumor Genomic Testing in Patients with Cancer 91%
- COVID-19 Outcomes in Patients with Cancer: Findings from the University of California Health System Database 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Addressing the Needs and Identifying Supports for Parents of Chronically Ill Adolescents and Young Adults in their Shared Transition from Pediatric to Adult Care: A Scoping Review Protocol 92%
- Challenges and facilitators in pathways to cancer diagnosis in Southern Africa: A qualitative study 92%
- The impact of patient-centered care on quality of life and hope among patients receiving home medical care: The Zaitaku Evaluative Initiatives and Outcome Study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- ALLIANCE A022104/NRG-GI010: The Janus Rectal Cancer Trial: a randomized phase II/III trial testing the efficacy of triplet versus doublet chemotherapy regarding clinical complete response and disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer 91%
- Landscape of Clinical Trials in Cancer Cachexia: Assessment of Trends From 1995-2024 91%
- Assessing awareness of blood cancer symptoms and barriers to symptomatic presentation: Measure development and results from a population survey in the UK 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-endoscopic screening for Barrett’s esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in at risk Veterans 89%
- Colorectal cancer screening based on predicted risk: a pilot randomized controlled trial 88%
- Incidence, prevalence, and survival of colorectal cancer in the United Kingdom from 2000-2021: a population-based cohort study 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.