Back

The past and potential antagonistic effects of fishing ban against nutrient loading control on eutrophication restoration in Lake Hongze

Qin, B.; Dakos, V.; Cai, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, X.; Zhang, E.; Wang, R.

2025-10-31 ecology
10.1101/2025.10.05.680530 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWIntegrated management strategies are often implemented to achieve comprehensive environmental restoration; however, the potential antagonistic effects among such measures are seldom examined. For instance, fishing bans, aimed at enhancing fish biodiversity in eastern China, may counteract the effectiveness of nutrient control measures in mitigating eutrophication. This study employs a dual modeling approach to evaluate this hypothesis in Lake Hongze, the fourth largest shallow lake in China. The PCLake model was calibrated using observational data from Lake Hongze collected between 2016 and 2020. The calibrated model was subsequently applied in a hindcast analysis from 2020 to 2024 and a forecast simulation from 2025 to 2030 to assess the impacts of fishing bans. Combined with structural equation modeling (SEM) path analysis, the results support the hypothesis that fishing bans can exhibit antagonistic effects on nutrient loading control by enhancing top-down regulation relative to bottom-up processes. Specifically, the fishing ban led to increased fish biomass, phytoplankton abundance, and nutrient levels over the past four years, while reducing the abundance of submerged macrophytes, zoobenthos, and zooplankton. Projections further indicate that such antagonistic effects would persist through 2030 if the fishing ban remains in place as planned. Additionally, model forecasts suggest that even with adjustments to the duration and intensity of fishing bans, antagonistic effects could be amplified under more stringent nutrient control scenarios. This study provides valuable insights into maximizing the net benefits of combined environmental management strategies through a systematic framework that evaluates both the effects and underlying processes of different interventions.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.