Back

Epistemic Mistrust and Rigidity mediate the effect of Individual Narcissism on Conspiracy Mentality: Investigating mediators of the narcissism-conspiracy link within the Epistemic Trust Framework

Brauner, F.; Schwarzer, N.-H.; Fonagy, P.; Campbell, C.; Griem, J.; Nolte, T.

2025-10-07 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.10.05.25337380 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPrior research has shown that belief in conspiracy theories (CTs) is associated with individual narcissism, encompassing both grandiosity and vulnerability. Initial evidence suggests that this link is mediated by mistrust and suspicion towards others, alongside rigid belief systems such as odd beliefs, fatalism, or delusions. ObjectiveWithin the Epistemic Trust (ET) framework, this study examined whether the narcissism-conspiracy link is accounted for by epistemic stances of mistrust and rigidity formed developmentally. MethodsA cross-sectional design was used, with self-report data from 417 UK-based adults from the non-clinical population. Pathological narcissism, assessed via the Pathological Narcissism Inventory (PNI), was modelled as the independent variable, and conspiracy mentality, assessed with the Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire (CMQ), as the dependent variable. Epistemic mistrust (Epistemic Trust, Mistrust, and Credulity Questionnaire; ETMCQ) and epistemic rigidity (Epistemic Vice Scale; EVS) were tested as mediators. Structural equation modelling (SEM) with latent variables was conducted. ResultsSEM indicated that epistemic mistrust and rigidity fully mediated the effect of narcissism on conspiracy mentality, accounting for 20% of the variance. This mediation pattern held for overall narcissism as well as the grandiosity and vulnerability subdimensions. ConclusionsThe influence of subclinical narcissistic traits on conspiracy mentality appears to operate via mistrust and rigidity in epistemic stance. For narcissistic individuals, these may function as defensive strategies to shield their belief systems from external challenge by disengaging from social input. The findings highlight the importance of communication strategies, informed by the ET framework, that promote openness and cognitive flexibility in individuals with heightened narcissism who endorse conspiratorial beliefs.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 4%
31.3%
2
Consciousness and Cognition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
3
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
4
Microbiology
65 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Affective Disorders
92 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.2%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.4%
7
Psychiatry Research
41 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
8
BMC Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
9
Social Science & Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
10
Psychophysiology
77 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
11
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
12
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
13
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
14
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
15
BJPsych Open
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
16
Epidemiology and Infection
89 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
17
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
19
Public Health
36 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
20
Behavioural Brain Research
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
23
Computational Psychiatry
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
25
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%
27
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%