Back

Epistemic Mistrust and Rigidity mediate the effect of Individual Narcissism on Conspiracy Mentality: Investigating mediators of the narcissism-conspiracy link within the Epistemic Trust Framework

Brauner, F.; Schwarzer, N.-H.; Fonagy, P.; Campbell, C.; Griem, J.; Nolte, T.

2025-10-07 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.10.05.25337380 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPrior research has shown that belief in conspiracy theories (CTs) is associated with individual narcissism, encompassing both grandiosity and vulnerability. Initial evidence suggests that this link is mediated by mistrust and suspicion towards others, alongside rigid belief systems such as odd beliefs, fatalism, or delusions. ObjectiveWithin the Epistemic Trust (ET) framework, this study examined whether the narcissism-conspiracy link is accounted for by epistemic stances of mistrust and rigidity formed developmentally. MethodsA cross-sectional design was used, with self-report data from 417 UK-based adults from the non-clinical population. Pathological narcissism, assessed via the Pathological Narcissism Inventory (PNI), was modelled as the independent variable, and conspiracy mentality, assessed with the Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire (CMQ), as the dependent variable. Epistemic mistrust (Epistemic Trust, Mistrust, and Credulity Questionnaire; ETMCQ) and epistemic rigidity (Epistemic Vice Scale; EVS) were tested as mediators. Structural equation modelling (SEM) with latent variables was conducted. ResultsSEM indicated that epistemic mistrust and rigidity fully mediated the effect of narcissism on conspiracy mentality, accounting for 20% of the variance. This mediation pattern held for overall narcissism as well as the grandiosity and vulnerability subdimensions. ConclusionsThe influence of subclinical narcissistic traits on conspiracy mentality appears to operate via mistrust and rigidity in epistemic stance. For narcissistic individuals, these may function as defensive strategies to shield their belief systems from external challenge by disengaging from social input. The findings highlight the importance of communication strategies, informed by the ET framework, that promote openness and cognitive flexibility in individuals with heightened narcissism who endorse conspiratorial beliefs.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.3%
2
Consciousness and Cognition
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
3
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.8%
5
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
7
Computational Psychiatry
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
8
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
9
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
10
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
12
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
13
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
14
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
15
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
17
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
18
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
19
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
25
Schizophrenia Research
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
26
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
29
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%