Back

Environmental DNA Metabarcoding Effectively Detects Invasive Species, Pests, and Community Changes in Taiwan Rice Fields

Banerjee, P.; Dey, G.; Stewart, K. A.; Barnes, M. A.; Taharia, M.; Seymour, M.; Wang, C.-W.; Sharma, R. K.; Maity, J. P.; Chen, C.-Y.

2025-10-04 ecology
10.1101/2025.10.03.680395 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Rice fields represent man-made semi-aquatic wetlands primed for invasive pests. Monitoring rice field biodiversity using conventional methods, however, is time-consuming and laborious. Environmental DNA (eDNA) methods can provide a fast and effective means to monitor rice field communities and inform management decisions. Our study provides proof-of-concept of rice field eDNA biodiversity assessments, with a focus on native and non-native pests across cultivation phases. We collected eDNA samples from locations in southern Taiwan during planting and harvesting, employing eDNA metabarcoding (COI) to detect diverse taxonomic groups. We assigned 77 ASVs across all sites to animal taxa, 34 of which were identified to species. Overall, 18 species were designated as native or non-native (83.3% and 16.6%, respectively), including three major rice pests, Chilo suppressalis (native), Coptotermes formosanus (native), and Pomacea canaliculata (non-native). Cultivation status affected overall diversity, with higher species richness during planting compared to harvesting. No significant differences were observed between native and non-native taxa between cultivation phases. Altogether, we detected a complex environment across trophic levels comprised of both native and non-native agricultural pests using limited sampling effort, demonstrating eDNA analysis as an efficient biomonitoring approach in rice agroecosystems with direct applications for pest, invasive species, and vector surveillance within Taiwan.

Published in Ecology and Evolution (predicted rank #3) · training set

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.