Back

Microclimatic Effects on Functional Traits of Arctostaphylos crustacea ssp. crustacea in Alameda County, California, USA

Hsiao, L.

2025-10-06 plant biology
10.1101/2025.10.03.680375 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Anthropogenic climate change and land-use changes threaten the health and survival of plants, particularly by altering the microclimatic conditions of habitats. Plant productivity is highly sensitive to these abiotic conditions that influence their morphological and physiological traits. I studied this relationship in plants of the Arctostaphylos genus, commonly known as manzanita, shrubs in chaparral ecosystems across California. I assessed microclimate and examined its effects on leaf morphological traits and plant productivity of A. crustacea ssp. crustacea across two sites in Alameda County, California. At the site of higher sunlight and less soil moisture (VWC), leaves had a greater mass per area (LMA) and were more steeply angled, and photosynthesis was significantly higher (11.14 {micro}molCO2/m2s) than leaves at the site of less sunlight and more VWC (7.94 {micro}molCO2/m2s). Results from linear mixed models showed that light level was the overall strongest predictor variable for plant traits, with vapor pressure deficit and VWC also contributing to LMA, and leaf temperature and leaf angle distribution also influencing photosynthesis. Overall, no individual microclimatic variable was the sole contributing predictor of a leaf morphological trait or photosynthesis. Rather a combination and interaction of microclimatic conditions influenced plant functional traits, though some conditions had greater influence than others. The functional traits of A. crustacea ssp. crustacea adjusted in response to microclimatic factors, showing intraspecific trait variation (ITV) of this species. ITV is an essential defense for plant resilience that allows for adaptations in the face of rapidly changing climatic conditions.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
14.1%
2
Annals of Botany
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.0%
4
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.7%
5
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
6
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
AoB PLANTS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
8
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
9
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.8%
10
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.2%
11
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
12
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
13
Environmental and Experimental Botany
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Planta
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.5%
18
Tree Physiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
19
Physiologia Plantarum
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
21
Plant Science
25 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
22
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
23
Plant Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
24
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Quantitative Plant Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%