Back

ΔCt-Informed, Calibrated Logistic Regression Accurately Attributes mecA in Staphylococcus aureus-Positive Wound Specimens.

Dehghani, M.; Norouzi, H.; Dehghan, S.; Lee, K. H.; Martin, H. L.

2025-10-05 microbiology
10.1101/2025.10.03.680191 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In wound specimens, co-detection of mecA and Staphylococcus aureus by PCR does not necessarily indicate MRSA because coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) frequently harbor mecA. We evaluated a {Delta}Ct-informed, biologically gated, calibrated logistic regression to attribute mecA to S. aureus versus CoNS. Using paired culture/AST and multiplex real-time PCR Ct values (internal n=93; external n=47), we trained 5-fold cross-validated models in the culture-positive S. aureus subset (n=36) and applied an S. aureus PCR gate (no attribution when S. aureus PCR is negative). The primary model achieved sensitivity 90.9% and specificity 92.0% for MRSA attribution with AUC 0.931 (out-of-fold). Decision curve analysis showed positive net benefit across clinically relevant thresholds; at the prespecified 50% cutoff, the model achieved a net benefit of 0.222 compared with negative benefit for a treat-all strategy. In an external cohort, S. aureus detection by PCR versus culture showed 92.3% sensitivity and 97.1% specificity; within S. aureus PCR-positives (n=12), MRSA attribution reached 100% sensitivity and 87.5% specificity (accuracy = 91.7%). This framework improves mecA interpretability in polymicrobial specimens and can reduce unnecessary MRSA-directed antibiotics.

Published in Microbiology Spectrum (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.