Back

Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiogram for Elevated Left Ventricular Filling Pressure

Lim, J.; Lee, M. S.; Suh, J. H.; Kang, S.; Lee, H. S.; Jang, J.-H.; Son, J. M.; Kwon, J.-M.; Kim, Y.-J.; Kim, K.-H.; Lee, S.-P.

2025-10-07 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2025.10.03.25337299 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundLeft ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) is associated with heart failure symptoms, a key prognostic marker, and a therapeutic target, but is difficult to measure non-invasively. We aimed to develop and validate a deep learning-based artificial intelligence (AI) model using a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) to detect elevated LVFP and assess its prognostic value. MethodsWe trained an AI model to detect increased LVFP. Septal E/e >15 on Doppler echocardiography was used to define increased LVFP and guide AI-ECG model training. The model was built upon a foundation model trained with >1 million multi-ethnic ECGs and fine-tuned through a development cohort of 225737 ECGs and 115982 echocardiogram data from 92775 unique patients from two tertiary hospitals. The model performance was assessed in a separate internal population from the development cohort (n=9278) and an independent external cohort from another tertiary hospital (n=17926). The prognostic significance of the AI-ECG output value was evaluated via survival analyses using the internal and external hospital cohorts, as well as the UK Biobank (n=43347). ResultsThe AI-ECG model detected increased LVFP with an area under the curve of 0{middle dot}868 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0{middle dot}859-0{middle dot}877) and 0{middle dot}850 (95% CI 0{middle dot}841-0{middle dot}858) in the internal and external test cohorts, respectively. The model output was an independent predictor of mortality in all three cohorts (adjusted hazard ratio per 10-point increment: internal 1.31 [95% CI 1{middle dot}23-1{middle dot}38]; external 1{middle dot}32 [95% CI 1{middle dot}28-1{middle dot}35]; UK Biobank 1.16 [95% CI 1{middle dot}07-1{middle dot}26]; all p<0{middle dot}001). Its prognostic capability was comparable or superior to traditional echocardiographic parameters, particularly in patients with comorbidities. ConclusionsThe AI-ECG may enable identification of patients with increased LVFP and provide powerful prognostic information. Further prospective studies are warranted to evaluate its clinical utility. CLINICAL PERSPECTIVEO_ST_ABSWhat Is New?C_ST_ABSO_LIBy using a specific, broadly applicable echocardiographic marker, E/e > 15 as the training target, our model circumvents the well-documented problems of indeterminate classifications and the exclusion of patients with atrial fibrillation, that have constrained previous models. C_LIO_LIThe most significant added value is the extensive external validation. We built our model upon a state-of-the-art, multi-ethnic foundation model pre-trained on >1 million ECGs, and demonstrated the models consistent high performance not only in an internal cohort but also in two independent, racially and geographically distinct external cohorts. This robust external validation directly confronts the critical challenge of generalizability. C_LI What Are the Clinical Implications?O_LIThe AI-ECG output value provides independent and meaningful prognostic information, with performance comparable or numerically superior to established traditional echocardiographic parameters. This was particularly evident in patients with comorbidities, where the role of traditional echocardiographic markers is often limited. C_LIO_LIThe AI-ECG may enable both population-level screening and enhance longitudinal management, offering an opportunity to identify at-risk individuals earlier and implement preventive strategies. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.2%
2
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.6%
3
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.3%
4
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
6
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.7%
8
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
9
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
10
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.9%
12
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
13
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
16
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
17
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.2%
18
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
19
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
20
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
21
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%