Bacterial quantification assay to detect and monitor Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in patients with bronchiectasis
Alferes de Lima Headley, D.; Bell, A. J.; Hull, R. C.; Kempen, M.-J. H. C.; Young, M.; Hennayake, C.; Du, Q.; Galloway, R.; McIntosh, E.; Eke, Z.; Richardson, H.; Long, M. B.; Williams-Macdonald, S.; Buchanan, H.; Mountjoy, E.; Sborchia, M.; Dand, P.; Halligan, D. L.; Long, J. A.; Kavanagh Williamson, M.; Vernon, G.; Fawcett-Gibson, D.; De Vega, D.; Sibila, O.; Aliberti, S.; Haworth, C. S.; Dakin, R.; Holmes, R.; Clarke, C.; Chalmers, J. D.
Show abstract
BackgroundPseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) is the most commonly detected pathogen in bronchiectasis. The clinical standard of care for pathogen detection is culture, which has low sensitivity. Early detection and improved monitoring could be used to enhance eradication and long-term suppressive treatments. MethodsA novel bacterial quantification assay (BQA) targeting ribosomal RNA for the detection of viable PA was developed. The BQA sensitivity and specificity in patient samples was assessed utilising culture (n=57); as well as BioFire pneumonia panel (n=111) and 16S rRNA gene sequencing (n=62). The potential clinical impact of the BQA in clinical settings was explored using two international patient cohorts. ResultsThe BQA detected PA in 100% of samples where PA was identified by other methods. The BQA quantification was positively correlated with quantitative culture (r=0.42; p<0.001) and BioFire (r=0.68; p<0.001). The BQA identified PA in an additional 23-44% of cases. To evaluate if this increased detection had clinical implications, we tested sputum samples considered to be PA negative by culture in patients who subsequently tested positive for PA. The BQA detected PA in 8/20 patient samples 8-484 days prior to primary detection by culture. In patients considered to have successful PA eradication by culture, the BQA detected PA in 13 samples from 27 patients who went on to relapse. ConclusionsThe BQA is a highly sensitive detection and quantification method for PA. The BQA demonstrated improved detection and treatment monitoring compared to culture, identifying patients who went on to either isolate a first PA or relapse.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Acceptable Performance of the Abbott ID NOW Among Symptomatic Individuals with Confirmed COVID-19 93%
- Concordance between upper and lower airway microbiota in children with Cystic Fibrosis 92%
- Evaluation of sample collection and transport strategies to enhance yield, accessibility, and biosafety of COVID-19 RT-PCR testing 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimal processing of tongue swab samples for Mycobacterium tuberculosis detection by the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay 93%
- Real-time RT-PCR Allelic Discrimination Assay for Detection of N501Y Mutation in the Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2 Associated with Variants of Concern 93%
- Testing tongue swab samples by Cepheid Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra: Comparison of two protocols applied to samples from persons with low-bacillary load TB 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Head-to head comparison of anterior nares and nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection in a community drive-through test centre in the UK 91%
- Two-way remote monitoring allows effective and realistic provision of home-NIV to COPD patients with persistent hypercapnia 90%
- Investigating a structured diagnostic approach for chronic breathlessness in primary care: a mixed-methods feasibility cluster Randomised Controlled Trial. 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multicentre evaluation of two multiplex PCR platforms for the rapid microbiological investigation of nosocomial pneumonia in UK ICUs: the INHALE WP1 study 95%
- Aerosol emission from the respiratory tract: an analysis of relative risks from oxygen delivery systems 90%
- Day-to-day Variability Indices improve utility of Oscillometry in Paediatric Asthma 90%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.