Back

Bacterial quantification assay to detect and monitor Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in patients with bronchiectasis

Alferes de Lima Headley, D.; Bell, A. J.; Hull, R. C.; Kempen, M.-J. H. C.; Young, M.; Hennayake, C.; Du, Q.; Galloway, R.; McIntosh, E.; Eke, Z.; Richardson, H.; Long, M. B.; Williams-Macdonald, S.; Buchanan, H.; Mountjoy, E.; Sborchia, M.; Dand, P.; Halligan, D. L.; Long, J. A.; Kavanagh Williamson, M.; Vernon, G.; Fawcett-Gibson, D.; De Vega, D.; Sibila, O.; Aliberti, S.; Haworth, C. S.; Dakin, R.; Holmes, R.; Clarke, C.; Chalmers, J. D.

2025-10-07 respiratory medicine
10.1101/2025.10.03.25336435 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) is the most commonly detected pathogen in bronchiectasis. The clinical standard of care for pathogen detection is culture, which has low sensitivity. Early detection and improved monitoring could be used to enhance eradication and long-term suppressive treatments. MethodsA novel bacterial quantification assay (BQA) targeting ribosomal RNA for the detection of viable PA was developed. The BQA sensitivity and specificity in patient samples was assessed utilising culture (n=57); as well as BioFire pneumonia panel (n=111) and 16S rRNA gene sequencing (n=62). The potential clinical impact of the BQA in clinical settings was explored using two international patient cohorts. ResultsThe BQA detected PA in 100% of samples where PA was identified by other methods. The BQA quantification was positively correlated with quantitative culture (r=0.42; p<0.001) and BioFire (r=0.68; p<0.001). The BQA identified PA in an additional 23-44% of cases. To evaluate if this increased detection had clinical implications, we tested sputum samples considered to be PA negative by culture in patients who subsequently tested positive for PA. The BQA detected PA in 8/20 patient samples 8-484 days prior to primary detection by culture. In patients considered to have successful PA eradication by culture, the BQA detected PA in 13 samples from 27 patients who went on to relapse. ConclusionsThe BQA is a highly sensitive detection and quantification method for PA. The BQA demonstrated improved detection and treatment monitoring compared to culture, identifying patients who went on to either isolate a first PA or relapse.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.6%
2
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
3
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
4
Respiratory Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.2%
6
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
10
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
11
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.8%
13
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
16
American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
17
Infection
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
18
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
20
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
21
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
BMC Microbiology
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%