Back

Development and Validation of a Real-Time PCR for the Detection of Haycocknema perplexum

Lowry, K.; Parmar, B.; Gupta, R.; Robertson, T.; Whiley, D.; Harris, P. N. A.; Davidson, N.

2025-10-07 infectious diseases
10.1101/2025.10.03.25336203 medRxiv
Show abstract

Haycocknema perplexum is a rare and emerging cause of parasitic myositis. Detection and surveillance are of growing importance given the increasing degree of climate conditions conducive to transmission. In this study, we developed a real-time PCR method for direct detection of two genomic regions of Haycocknema perplexum. The real-time PCR assays, SSU-PCR and COX1-PCR targeted the small subunit of nuclear ribosomal RNA and cytochrome oxidase-1 genomic regions, respectively. The performance of the assays was assessed using a panel of H. perplexum samples, both fresh frozen and formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue (FFPE) (n = 22, derived from eight patients) and non-H. perplexum (n = 8) tissue biopsy specimens. Both H. perplexum assays showed 83% sensitivity and 100% specificity, with negative and positive predictive values of 100% and 93% respectively. The results indicate that the LOD was 10-5 dilution (Ct value 40.2) for COX1-PCR, and 10-3 dilution (Ct value 39.6) for SSU-PCR, making the latter a more sensitive assay for detecting lower concentrations of organism in the patient biopsy. The sensitivity of fresh frozen samples was superior to FFPE samples. All but 1 sample was negative following treatment. Feasibility of real-time PCR detection of H. perplexum directly from tissue biopsies has been demonstrated for diagnosis, possible test of cure and could enhance transmission surveillance.

Published in Pathology · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.