Back

Automated Specimen Triage for Dark Taxa: Deep Learning Enables Orientation, Sex Identification, and Anatomical Segmentation from Robotic Imaging

Shirali, H.; Wuehrl, L.; Lee, L.; Klug, N.; Meier, R.; Pylatiuk, C.; Hartop, E.

2025-10-04 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.10.02.680063 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Robotic specimen processing is transforming biodiversity discovery by replacing labor-intensive handling with scalable systems that can simultaneously generate high-quality specimen images. We demonstrate that these images can be leveraged by deep learning to efficiently extract key biological information and guide targeted specimen processing. Using a model dark taxon, the Phoridae (Diptera), the workflow performs three core tasks: sex identification, specimen orientation classification, and anatomical segmentation. Sex identification allows selective retention of diagnostically informative specimens, avoiding wasted effort on non-diagnostic individuals. Orientation classification enables specimens in the desired orientation to proceed immediately, while suboptimally oriented specimens can be repositioned for informative processing. Anatomical segmentation allows targeted processing of specimens displaying diagnostic characters or targeted analysis of specific anatomical regions in subsequent workflow steps. Comparative analysis of model architectures shows task-specific selection is crucial: a Convolutional Neural Network achieved an accuracy of 0.94 for orientation, a Vision Transformer achieved 0.88 for sex, and a U-Net precisely segmented nine anatomical regions with a mean IoU of 0.78. These results demonstrate that robotic imaging combined with deep learning provides a validated foundation for high-throughput, targeted specimen processing, maximising efficiency and utility for taxonomic and trait-based analyses, and supporting scalable, sustainable biodiversity workflows.

Published in Systematic Entomology (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

Systematic Entomology · published here
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.8%
2
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.2%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.4%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.1%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.5%
7
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.3%
8
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.3%
9
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.5%
10
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
11
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
12
Applications in Plant Sciences
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
13
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
14
Molecular Ecology Resources
171 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
Integrative and Comparative Biology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
16
Ecological Informatics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
17
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.0%
18
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
20
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 39%
0.6%
21
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
22
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.6%
23
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
24
Systematic Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%