Back

Acoustic Coupling for Double-Blind Human Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Neuromodulation

Kapoor, A.; Strohman, A.; Ni, Y.; Isaac, G.; Raymond, J.; Legon, W.

2025-10-10 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.10.02.680055 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveLow-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique with the potential for precise targeting of small and deep human brain circuitry. To ensure rigorous and reproducible effects, it is necessary to implement double-blinding to mitigate potential experimental biases. This study innovates on previous ultrasound coupling methods by embedding a 3D-printed thermoplastic disc in a high-density gel-polymer matrix to create identical gel-plastic coupling devices that either transmit (verum) or block (sham) ultrasound. MethodsWe evaluated varying thicknesses (1.5 mm, 2,0 mm, 2.5 mm) and infill densities (25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%) of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) for insertion loss and effects on beam characteristics across relevant human neuromodulation frequencies from 0.2 - 1 MHz. ResultsABS at 1.5 mm thickness and 50 % infill had the lowest insertion loss at 0.50 MHz of 0.9 {+/-} 0.04 dB demonstrating acoustic transparency suitable for a verum device. For the sham device, we introduced an internal air gap that produced 31 dB insertion loss at 0.50 MHz. The verum device demonstrated minimal effects on the beam shape with a radial peak shift of 0.3 {+/-} 0.2 mm and an average axial shift of 0.5 mm. DiscussionThis novel gel-plastic coupling device can be tailored to most LIFU transducer shapes and is designed to support double-blind protocols by maintaining visual and tactile indistinguishability while controlling transmitted energy. This method provides a cost-effective and easily implementable solution for double-blinding in human LIFU studies to improve the reliability and rigor of experimental outcomes.

Published in Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology (predicted rank #24) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.