Back

Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Species in Patients with Concurrent COVID-19 and Mycobacterial Disease

Eliseev, P.; Bairakova, A.; Kazyulina, A.; Kuznetsov, E.; Samoilova, A.; Vasilieva, I.

2025-10-07 infectious diseases
10.1101/2025.10.02.25337223 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe incidence of nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) diseases is increasing globally, with risk factors remaining poorly understood. COVID-19 may alter respiratory tract conditions affecting NTM colonization and infection patterns. ObjectiveTo evaluate species diversity of NTM isolated from patients with NTM-associated diseases with and without a history of COVID-19. MethodsWe analyzed 464 clinical NTM isolates from Russian patients stratified by COVID-19 status (COVID-19+, n=271; COVID-19-, n=193). Diagnosis verification followed ATS/ERS/ESCMID/IDSA Clinical Practice Guidelines. Species identification employed MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and molecular techniques. Statistical analyses used chi-square and Fishers exact tests with 95% confidence intervals. ResultsSlowly growing species predominated in both groups (97.9% vs 98.2%, p>0.05). COVID-19 was associated with a significant 28% reduction in Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) prevalence (94.8% vs 66.8%, p<0.05), primarily due to decreased M. avium isolation (80.3% vs 52.0%, p<0.05). Conversely, rare NTM species showed increased prevalence in COVID-19+ patients: M. kansasii complex (0% vs 8.1%, p<0.05), M. terrae complex (0% vs 3.3%, p<0.05), M. simiae complex (0.5% vs 7.0%, p<0.05), and unclassifiable species (2.6% vs 12.9%, p<0.05). ConclusionsCOVID-19 significantly alters the NTM species spectrum in patients with NTM-associated diseases, with reduced MAC prevalence and increased detection of rare NTM species. These findings highlight the importance of species-level identification and may require adaptation of diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in post-COVID patients.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.